Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28198554›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2017

Practical approaches to adverse outcome pathway development and weight-of-evidence evaluation as illustrated by ecotoxicological case studies.

Kellie A Fay, Daniel L Villeneuve, Carlie A LaLone, You Song, Knut Erik Tollefsen, Gerald T Ankley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathway-based predictive approaches for non-animal assessment of acute inhalation toxicity.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Review
  14. Harvesting the promise of AOPs: An assessment and recommendations.The Science of the total environment · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment.Environmental sciences Europe · 2018
    Review
  19. The Role of Omics in the Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways for Chemical Risk Assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kellie A FayMid- Continent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1132-4484
Daniel L VilleneuveMid- Continent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Carlie A LaLoneMid- Continent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
You SongNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway.
Knut Erik TollefsenNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway.
Gerald T AnkleyMid- Continent Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) describe toxicant effects as a sequential chain of causally linked events beginning with a molecular perturbation and culminating in an adverse outcome at an individual or population level. Strategies for developing AOPs are still evolving and depend largely on the intended use or motivation for development and data availability. The present review describes 4 ecotoxicological AOP case studies, developed for different purposes. In each situation, creation of the AOP began in a manner determined by the initial motivation for its creation and expanded either to include additional components of the pathway or to address the domains of applicability in terms of chemical initiators, susceptible species, life stages, and so forth. Some general strategies can be gleaned from these case studies, which a developer may find to be useful for supporting an existing AOP or creating a new one. Several web-based tools that can aid in AOP assembly and evaluation of weight of evidence for scientific robustness of AOP components are highlighted. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:1429-1449. © 2017 SETAC.

Indexed as

AnimalsEcotoxicologyFluoxetineHazardous SubstancesHumansInsecticidesReceptors, SteroidRisk AssessmentSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSodium ChannelsWater Pollutants, Chemicalecdysone receptorFluoxetineHazardous SubstancesInsecticidesReceptors, SteroidSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSodium ChannelsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdverse outcome pathwayCase studyEcotoxicologyRisk assessmentWeight of evidence

Identifiers

PMID28198554
PMCPMC6058314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.