ArticleScientific reports2017
A Simple Method for Noninvasive Quantification of Pressure Gradient Across the Pulmonary Valve.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure gradient across the pulmonary valve (PVPG) is an important hemodynamic variable used in the management of patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. However, a reliable noninvasive method is unavailable. We hypothesized that a progressive Muller maneuver would elicit the pulmonary valve premature opening (PVPO) in diastole and that this event would be detectable by Doppler echocardiography. The intrathoracic pressure (ITP) decrease during this maneuver equals PVPG, which may be assessed with a custom airway pressure measurement device. A total of 102 subjects were enrolled in the study. At the earliest appearance of PVPO, the ITP decrease was recorded as the PVPG. PVPG was also simultaneously measured and compared by other two methods: right heart catheterization in 43 subjects, and routine Doppler echocardiography (pulmonary regurgitation jet) in the other 59 subjects. The results measured by different approaches were compared using the Bland-Altman analysis. PVPG assessed via PVPO showed strong agreement with PVPG measured by catheterization or routine Doppler echocardiography methods, with Lin concordance correlation coefficients of 0.91 and 0.70, respectively. In conclusion, PVPO provides a new noninvasive method of quantification of PVPG.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.