Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28198095›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017

Genetic risk models: Influence of model size on risk estimates and precision.

Ying Shan, Gerard Tromp, Helena Kuivaniemi, Diane T Smelser, Shefali S Verma, Marylyn D Ritchie, James R Elmore, David J Carey, Yvette P Conley, Michael B Gorin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ying ShanDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Gerard TrompThe Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Helena KuivaniemiThe Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Diane T SmelserThe Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shefali S VermaDepartment of Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
James R ElmoreDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA.
David J CareyThe Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Yvette P ConleyDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Michael B GorinDepartments of Ophthalmology and Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Daniel E WeeksDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

GENETICS OF AGE-RELATED MACULOPATHYR01EY009859 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GORIN, MICHAEL B · 1993 to 2011
$11.5M
ARRA NIH HHSNEI NIH HHS R01 EY009859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease risk estimation plays an important role in disease prevention. Many studies have found that the ability to predict risk improves as the number of risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the risk model increases. However, the width of the confidence interval of the risk estimate is often not considered in the evaluation of the risk model. Here, we explore how the risk and the confidence interval width change as more SNPs are added to the model in the order of decreasing effect size, using both simulated data and real data from studies of abdominal aortic aneurysms and age-related macular degeneration. Our results show that confidence interval width is positively correlated with model size and the majority of the bigger models have wider confidence interval widths than smaller models. Once the model size is bigger than a certain level, the risk does not shift markedly, as 100% of the risk estimates of the one-SNP-bigger models lie inside the confidence interval of the one-SNP-smaller models. We also created a confidence interval-augmented reclassification table. It shows that both more effective SNPs with larger odds ratios and less effective SNPs with smaller odds ratios contribute to the correct decision of whom to screen. The best screening strategy is selected and evaluated by the net benefit quantity and the reclassification rate. We suggest that individuals whose upper bound of their risk confidence interval is above the screening threshold, which corresponds to the population prevalence of the disease, should be screened.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalComputer SimulationConfidence IntervalsDatabases, GeneticFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSample Sizeconfidence intervaldisease risk estimationmodel sizereclassification

Identifiers

PMID28198095
PMCPMC5628612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.