Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28198052›Full record

ReviewAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?

Daniel Kardefelt-Winther, Alexandre Heeren, Adriano Schimmenti, Antonius van Rooij, Pierre Maurage, Michelle Carras, Johan Edman, Alexander Blaszczynski, Yasser Khazaal, Joël Billieux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 238 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
238citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

238 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Excessive Exercise-A Meta-Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

178 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel Kardefelt-WintherDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexandre HeerenDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Adriano SchimmentiFaculty of Human and Social Sciences, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy.
Antonius van RooijDepartment of Communication Sciences, imec-mict-Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-3551
Pierre MaurageLaboratory for Experimental Psychopathology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.
Michelle CarrasDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-524X
Johan EdmanCentre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander BlaszczynskiGambling Treatment Clinic and Research, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Yasser KhazaalGeneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joël BillieuxLaboratory for Experimental Psychopathology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.

Funding

PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH014592 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEATHER E VOLK, Peter P. Zandi · 1985 to 2026
$8.5M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the recent changes to the diagnostic category for addictive disorders in DSM-5, it is urgent to clarify what constitutes behavioural addiction to have a clear direction for future research and classification. However, in the years following the release of DSM-5, an expanding body of research has increasingly classified engagement in a wide range of common behaviours and leisure activities as possible behavioural addiction. If this expansion does not end, both the relevance and the credibility of the field of addictive disorders might be questioned, which may prompt a dismissive appraisal of the new DSM-5 subcategory for behavioural addiction. We propose an operational definition of behavioural addiction together with a number of exclusion criteria, to avoid pathologizing common behaviours and provide a common ground for further research. The definition and its exclusion criteria are clarified and justified by illustrating how these address a number of theoretical and methodological shortcomings that result from existing conceptualizations. We invite other researchers to extend our definition under an Open Science Foundation framework.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveHumansAddiction theorybehavioral addictiondiagnosisDSM-5gambling disorderinternet gaming disordernon-substance related addictionspathologizationtheory development

Identifiers

PMID28198052
PMCPMC5557689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.