Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28198038›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2017

Likelihood of cesarean delivery after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.

Jeremy L Neal, Nancy K Lowe, Julia C Phillippi, Sharon L Ryan, Amy M Knupp, Mary S Dietrich, Stephen F Thung

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences of labor dystocia.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2020
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeremy L NealVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-2239
Nancy K LoweCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Julia C PhillippiVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sharon L RyanClinical Nursing, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA.
Amy M KnuppNursing Quality Improvement & Patient Safety at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mary S DietrichSchools of Nursing and Medicine at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Stephen F ThungDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K08 HS024733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFriedman, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM) support different active labor diagnostic guidelines. Our aims were to compare likelihoods for cesarean delivery among women admitted before vs in active labor by diagnostic guideline (within-guideline comparisons) and between women admitted in active labor per one or more of the guidelines (between-guideline comparisons).

designActive labor diagnostic guidelines were retrospectively applied to cervical examination data from nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset (n = 2573). Generalized linear models were used to determine outcome likelihoods within- and between-guideline groups.

resultsAt admission, 15.7%, 48.3%, and 10.1% of nulliparous women were in active labor per Friedman, NICE, and ACOG/SMFM diagnostic guidelines, respectively. Cesarean delivery was more likely among women admitted before vs in active labor per the Friedman (AOR 1.75 [95% CI 1.08-2.82] or NICE guideline (AOR 2.55 [95% CI 1.84-3.53]). Between guidelines, cesarean delivery was less likely among women admitted in active labor per the NICE guideline, as compared with the ACOG/SMFM guideline (AOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.35-0.88]).

conclusionMany nulliparous women are admitted to the hospital before active labor onset. These women are significantly more likely to have a cesarean delivery. Diagnosing active labor before admission or before intervention to speed labor may be one component of a multi-faceted approach to decreasing the primary cesarean rate in the United States. The NICE diagnostic guideline is more inclusive than Friedman or ACOG/SMFM guidelines and its use may be the most clinically useful for safely lowering cesarean rates.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansLabor, InducedLabor OnsetLinear ModelsObstetric Labor ComplicationsOxytocinParityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesSocieties, MedicalOxytocincesarean sectionlabor onsetnulliparityoxytocinparturition

Identifiers

PMID28198038
PMCPMC7608623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.