Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197895›Full record

ReviewMusculoskeletal surgery2017

Follow-up of surgical and minimally invasive treatment of Achilles tendon pathology: a brief diagnostic imaging review.

A Barile, F Bruno, S Mariani, F Arrigoni, L Brunese, M Zappia, A Splendiani, E Di Cesare, C Masciocchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Acute and overuse elbow trauma: radio-orthopaedics overview.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Imaging of pediatric foot disorders.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A BarileDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy. antonio.barile@cc.univaq.it.
F BrunoDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
S MarianiDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
F ArrigoniDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
L BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
M ZappiaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
A SplendianiDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
E Di CesareDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
C MasciocchiDepartment of Biotechnologies and Applied Clinical Sciences, S. Salvatore Hospital Coppito, University of L'Aquila, Via L. Natali, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The follow-up of an operated tendon is primarily clinical, although clinical examination may not be sufficient in the presence of certain complications. The imaging techniques are of great value not only in the diagnosis of tendon pathologies, but also as an adjunct to clinical evaluation. This is particularly true in the follow-up of patients submitted to surgical tendon reconstruction, by monitoring morphological effects of different interventions and evaluating tendon healing processes. Interpretation of imaging findings requires knowledge of the imaging appearance of the operated tendon during the healing phase, to distinguish between normal postsurgical changes and real pathology, as well as knowledge of surgical technique, postoperative course (including type of prescribed therapy) and possible postoperative complications. The most important imaging modalities to examine the Achilles tendon are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. This article gives a review of some of the most common treatment strategies for Achilles tendon pathology, expected postoperative imaging findings and postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonMagnetic Resonance ImagingMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPlastic Surgery ProceduresUltrasonographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySuture TechniquesTendon InjuriesTreatment OutcomeAchilles tendonInterventional radiologyMRISurgeryUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.