ArticleLa Radiologia medica2017
Enhancing pancreatic mass with normal serum CA19-9: key MDCT features to characterize pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from its mimics.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling GDF15 as a promising biomarker for predicting survival in pancreatic ductal carcinoma: a retrospective research.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- TheJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Imaging differentiation of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Prognostic evaluation of pancreatic cancer based on the model of chemo-radiotherapy resistance-related genes.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Identification of fibroblast-related genes based on single-cell and machine learning to predict the prognosis and endocrine metabolism of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Identification and prognostic analysis of biomarkers to predict the progression of pancreatic cancer patients.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers by Combined mRNA and miRNA Expression Microarray Analysis in Pancreatic Cancer.Translational oncology · 2018Article
- Does Computed Tomography Have the Ability to Differentiate Aggressive From Nonaggressive Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm?Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine key MDCT features for characterizing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNET) from their mimics, which manifest as enhancing pancreatic mass with normal serum CA19-9 level.
methodsThis retrospective study had institutional review board approval and informed consent was waived. Preoperative multiphase MDCT of 74 patients with enhancing pancreatic masses and normal serum CA19-9 levels were included. Surgical pathologies were PNET (n = 42), microcystic serous cystadenomas (m-SCN, n = 12) and solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasms (SPEN, n = 20). Two radiologists independently evaluated CT images with a checklist of findings. Frequencies of findings with each disease entity were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the key MDCT features alone and in combination. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated.
resultsThe most common findings for PNET were mosaic morphological pattern (33/42, 78.6%) and enhancement peak in pancreatic arterial phase (PAP, 32/42, 76.2%), for m-SCN were honeycomb pattern (9/12, 75.0%) and enhancement peak in PAP (10/12, 83.3%) and for SPEN were melting icecream pattern (16/20, 80.0%) and hypo-enhancement in all phases (18/20, 90.0). Using a combination of morphological patterns and enhancement features, PNET was identified with 88% sensitivity and 81% specificity, m-SCN was identified with 83% sensitivity and 94% specificity, and SPEN was identified with 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Inter-observer agreement concerning CT findings was good to excellent (κ = 0.68 to 0.81, all p < 0.01).
conclusionsMorphological features and enhancement patterns on MDCT are key features for characterizing enhancing pancreatic mass with normal serum CA19-9. PNET could be differentiated from its mimics with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.