Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197810›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2017

A wrist sensor and algorithm to determine instantaneous walking cadence and speed in daily life walking.

Benedikt Fasel, Cyntia Duc, Farzin Dadashi, Flavien Bardyn, Martin Savary, Pierre-André Farine, Kamiar Aminian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benedikt FaselLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IBI LMAM, Station 9, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9322-0621
Cyntia DucLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IBI LMAM, Station 9, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Farzin DadashiLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IBI LMAM, Station 9, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Flavien BardynElectronics and Signal Processing Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IMT ESPLAB, Rue de la Maladière 71B, Case postale 526, 2002, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Martin SavaryElectronics and Signal Processing Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IMT ESPLAB, Rue de la Maladière 71B, Case postale 526, 2002, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Pierre-André FarineElectronics and Signal Processing Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IMT ESPLAB, Rue de la Maladière 71B, Case postale 526, 2002, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Kamiar AminianLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IBI LMAM, Station 9, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. kamiar.aminian@epfl.ch.

Funding

Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research, Switzerland CTI 14787.1 PFNM-NM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In daily life, a person's gait-an important marker for his/her health status-is usually assessed using inertial sensors fixed to lower limbs or trunk. Such sensor locations are not well suited for continuous and long duration measurements. A better location would be the wrist but with the drawback of the presence of perturbative movements independent of walking. The aim of this study was to devise and validate an algorithm able to accurately estimate walking cadence and speed for daily life walking in various environments based on acceleration measured at the wrist. To this end, a cadence likelihood measure was designed, automatically filtering out perturbative movements and amplifying the periodic wrist movement characteristic of walking. Speed was estimated using a piecewise linear model. The algorithm was validated for outdoor walking in various and challenging environments (e.g., trail, uphill, downhill). Cadence and speed were successfully estimated for all conditions. Overall median (interquartile range) relative errors were -0.13% (-1.72 2.04%) for instantaneous cadence and -0.67% (-6.52 6.23%) for instantaneous speed. The performance was comparable to existing algorithms for trunk- or lower limb-fixed sensors. The algorithm's low complexity would also allow a real-time implementation in a watch.

Indexed as

AccelerationAdultAlgorithmsFemaleGaitHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMovementWalkingWalking SpeedCadenceInertial sensorSpeedWalkingWrist

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.