ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2017
Outflow angle measurement: a simple approach for the differential diagnosis of intracranial protrusion with a branch artery arising from its top.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an important diagnosis method for the detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs), but it is not useful for differentiating between IA and infundibular dilatation (ID) in patients in whom imaging shows an intracranial protrusion with a branch artery at its top. The objective of this study was to introduce a new approach-measurement of the outflow angle (OA)-for differentiating between IA and ID in such cases.
methodsThe study included 7 patients with a total of 9 protrusions. The protrusions were separately reviewed on MRA and DSA images. We first diagnosed the protrusions using OA approach. An OA ≥90° was considered indicative of an IA and an OA <90° was considered indicative of an ID. The diagnosis by the OA method was compared with diagnosis by the gold standard-DSA.
resultsAmong the 9 intracranial protrusions, 5 were IAs and 4 were IDs. The OAs of 5 IAs were all ≥90°; the average OA of the 5 IAs was 115.20°. The OAs of the 4 IDs were all <90°; the average OA of the 4 IDs was 59.50°. The diagnosis results by the OA method were in agreement with DSA diagnosis in all cases.
conclusionThe OA method can discriminate between IA and ID in patients in whom imaging shows an intracranial protrusion with a branch artery at its top. The method is simple and convenient, and can be easily applied in clinical practice. It can be especially useful for novice neuroradiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.