Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197701›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2017

[Innovative forms of specific immunotherapy].

P Zieglmayer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P ZieglmayerAllergieambulatorium Wien West, Hütteldorferstr. 46, 1150, Wien, Österreich. petra@zieglmayer.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy depends on tolerance induction. Treatment success is currently limited by treatment-related adverse reactions. Novel approaches mainly target improvement of tolerability in addition to optimized immunogenicity. For epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT), commercially available treatment extracts are applied to skin via a patch. The route exhibits excellent tolerability and good clinical efficacy. The first encouraging data on a peanut EPIT were published in 2016. Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) study results show pronounced immunogenicity and persisting clinical efficacy after only three injections of a small amount of established extracts. New approaches of synthetic vaccine development focus on tolerance induction. These vaccines are genetically engineered with a precisely defined profile and can be manufactured in reproducible quality. Distinct immunogenicity of the antigenic determinants contained in the preparation as well as an optimized safety profile are expected. Grass, birch, cat, and mite vaccines are currently under investigation. Which of these approaches will gain market access is unclear up to date. Results of food immunotherapy studies reveal consistently poor tolerance and limited efficacy without encouraging perspective and are not discussed further.

Indexed as

Drug ToleranceAllergensAnimalsDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansHypersensitivityAllergensAllergyEpicutaneous immunotherapyIntralymphatic immunotherapySynthetic allergy vaccineTolerance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.