Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197679›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2017

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Stephan Ehrmann, Andrew Quartin, Brian P Hobbs, Vincent Robert-Edan, Cynthia Cely, Cynthia Bell, Genevieve Lyons, Tai Pham, Roland Schein, Yimin Geng and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Predictive ability of serum osmolarity for contrast-induced nephropathy after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Are we having a new target?The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Predictive value of CHAThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan EhrmannMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Tours, 37044, Tours, France. stephanehrmann@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-4467
Andrew QuartinDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Brian P HobbsDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Vincent Robert-EdanRéanimation Chirurgicale Polyvalente, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Laënnec, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes, France.
Cynthia CelyDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Cynthia BellDivision of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Genevieve LyonsDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Tai PhamRéanimation et USC Médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, 75970, Paris, France.
Roland ScheinDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Yimin GengResearch Medical Library, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Karim LakhalRéanimation Chirurgicale Polyvalente, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Laënnec, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes, France.
Chaan S NgDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami · USHôpital Laennec · FRSt. Michael's Hospital · CAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCritically ill patients, among whom acute kidney injury is common, are often considered particularly vulnerable to iodinated contrast medium nephrotoxicity. However, the attributable incidence remains uncertain given the paucity of observational studies including a control group. This study assessed acute kidney injury incidence attributable to iodinated contrast media in critically ill patients based on new data accounting for sample and effect size and including a control group.

methodsSystematic review of studies measuring incidence of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients following contrast medium exposure compared to matched unexposed patients. Patient-level meta-analysis implementing a Bayesian nested mixed effects multiple logistic regression model.

resultsTen studies were identified; only four took into account the baseline acute kidney injury risk, three by patient matching (560 patients). Objective meta-analysis of these three studies (vague and impartial a priori hypothesis concerning attributable acute kidney injury risk) did not find that iodinated contrast media increased the incidence of acute kidney injury (odds ratio 0.95, 95% highest posterior density interval 0.45-1.62). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that, to conclude in favor of a statistically significant incidence of acute kidney injury attributable to contrast media despite this observed lack of association, one's a priori belief would have to be very strongly biased, assigning to previous uncontrolled reports 3-12 times the weight of evidence strength provided by the matched studies including a control group.

conclusionsMeta-analysis of matched cohort studies of iodinated contrast medium exposure does not support a significant incidence of acute kidney injury attributable to iodinated contrast media in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAdministration, IntravenousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremCohort StudiesContrast MediaCritical CareFemaleHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsIodineMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaIodineContrast media (MeSH: D003287)Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions (MeSH D064420)Intensive care units (MeSH D007362)Percutaneous coronary interventions (MeSH: D062645)Tomography scanners, X-ray computed (MeSH: D015898)

Identifiers

PMID28197679
OpenAlexW2587912615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.