ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017
Prefraction displacement and intrafraction drift of the prostate due to perineal ultrasound probe pressure.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Ranges of Probe Pressure Are Applied During Ultrasound Examinations? A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Physician reported toxicities and patient reported quality of life of transperineal ultrasound-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- The ProMotion LMU dataset (2022 edition), prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Distance Between the Tumour and Nipple as a Predictor of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- The ProMotion LMU dataset, prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Review
- Shorter treatment times reduce the impact of intra-fractional motion : A real-time 4DUS study comparing VMAT vs. step-and-shoot IMRT for prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018Article
- The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients.BioMed research international · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn image-guided EBRT of the prostate, transperineal ultrasound (US) probes exert pressure on the perineum both during planning and treatment. Through tissue deformation and relaxation, this causes target and risk organ displacement and drift. In this study, prefraction shift and intrafraction drift of the prostate are quantified during robotic transperineal 4DUS.
methodsThe position of the prostate was recorded for different positions of the probe before treatment in 10 patients (16 series of measurements). During treatment (15 patients, 273 fractions), intrafraction motion of the prostate was tracked (total of 27 h and 24 min) with the transperineal probe in place.
resultsPer 1 mm shift of the US probe in the cranial direction, a displacement of the prostate by 0.42 ± 0.09 mm in the cranial direction was detected. The relationship was found to be linear (R² = 0.97) and highly significant (p < 0.0001). After initial contact of the probe and the perineum (no pressure), a shift of the probe of about 5-10 mm was typically necessary to achieve good image quality, corresponding to a shift of the prostate of about 2-4 mm in the cranial direction. Tissue compression and prostate displacement were well visible. During treatment, the prostate drifted at an average rate of 0.075 mm/min in the cranial direction (p = 0.0014).
conclusionThe pressure applied by a perineal US probe has a quantitatively similar impact on prostate displacement as transabdominal pressure. Shifts are predominantly in the cranial direction (typically 2-4 mm) with some component in the anterior direction (typically <1 mm). Slight probe pressure can improve image quality, but excessive probe pressure can distort the surrounding anatomy and potentially move risk organs closer to the high-dose area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.