Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197544›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Plasticity in Brainstem Mechanisms of Pain Modulation by Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Rat.

Francis J Jareczek, Stephanie R White, Donna L Hammond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain circuits for pain and its treatment.Science translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francis J JareczekMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242.ORCID 0000-0002-3129-1256
Stephanie R WhiteDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA 52242.
Donna L HammondInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; Department of Pharmacology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-0441
University of Iowa · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GEYER, PAMELA K., LENTZ, STEVEN R · 1985 to 2020
$15.9M
OPIOID MECHANISMS OF ANALGESIAR01DA006736 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HAMMOND, DONNA L · 1991 to 2013
$3.7M
Mechanistic Bases for the Adverse Interaction of Nicotine and Chronic PainF30DA036964 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI JARECZEK, FRANCIS JOSEF · 2014 to 2017
$138k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA036964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA006736NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with chronic pain may be driven to smoke more because the analgesic efficacy of nicotine diminishes. To determine whether persistent pain diminishes the actions of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist in pain modulatory pathways, we examined the effects of epibatidine in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) of rats with and without inflammatory injury induced by intraplantar injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). In uninjured rats, epibatidine produced a dose-dependent antinociception that was completely blocked by dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE; α4β2 antagonist) and partially blocked by methyllycaconitine (MLA; α7 antagonist). Epibatidine reversed heat hyperalgesia when microinjected in the RVM 4 h, 4 d, or 2 weeks after CFA treatment. Although DHβE completely blocked epibatidine's antihyperalgesic effect at 4 h, at 2 weeks it elicited only partial antagonism. Methyllycaconitine was ineffective at both time points. Epibatidine's antinociceptive efficacy in the uninjured hind paw progressively declined, and it was without effect 2 weeks after CFA. Moreover, as early as 4 h after CFA, the antinociceptive effect of epibatidine was no longer antagonized by DHβE. Neither antagonist alone altered paw withdrawal latency in uninjured or CFA-treated rats, suggesting that neither α4β2 nor α7 nAChRs are tonically active in the RVM. The

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsBrain StemCholinergic AgentsDisease Models, AnimalInflammationMaleNeuronal PlasticityPainPain PerceptionRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicAnalgesicsCholinergic AgentsReceptors, Nicotinicantinociceptioncomplete Freund’s adjuvantepibatidinenicotinic acetylcholine receptorsrostral ventromedial medulla

Identifiers

PMID28197544
PMCPMC5286660
OpenAlexW2577125086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.