Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197403›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2017

Network Plasticity and Intraoperative Mapping for Personalized Multimodal Management of Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas.

Cristina Diana Ghinda, Hugues Duffau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lesion-Specific Language Network Alterations in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Shows Corpus Callosum Differences between High-Grade Gliomas and Metastases.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristina Diana GhindaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Neuroscience Division, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Hugues DuffauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier University Medical Center, Montpellier, France; Brain Plasticity, Stem Cells and Glial Tumors Team, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumors and include a variety of different histological tumor types and malignancy grades. Recent achievements in terms of molecular and imaging fields have created an unprecedented opportunity to perform a comprehensive interdisciplinary assessment of the glioma pathophysiology, with direct implications in terms of the medical and surgical treatment strategies available for patients. The current paradigm shift considers glioma management in a comprehensive perspective that takes into account the intricate connectivity of the cerebral networks. This allowed significant improvement in the outcome of patients with lesions previously considered inoperable. The current review summarizes the current theoretical framework integrating the adult human brain plasticity and functional reorganization within a dynamic individualized treatment strategy for patients affected by diffuse low-grade gliomas. The concept of neuro-oncology as a brain network surgery has major implications in terms of the clinical management and ensuing outcomes, as indexed by the increased survival and quality of life of patients managed using such an approach.

Indexed as

anatomofunctional connectivityawake surgerydirect electrical stimulationfunctional brain mappingintraoperative mappinglow-grade gliomasneuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID28197403
PMCPMC5281570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.