Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28197141›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Metabolomic and Metagenomic Analysis of Two Crude Oil Production Pipelines Experiencing Differential Rates of Corrosion.

Vincent Bonifay, Boris Wawrik, Jan Sunner, Emily C Snodgrass, Egemen Aydin, Kathleen E Duncan, Amy V Callaghan, Athenia Oldham, Turid Liengen, Iwona Beech

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent BonifayDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Boris WawrikDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Jan SunnerDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, NormanOK, USA; Institute for Energy and the Environment, University of Oklahoma, NormanOK, USA.
Emily C SnodgrassDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Egemen AydinDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Kathleen E DuncanDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Amy V CallaghanDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Athenia OldhamDepartment of Biology, University of Texas of the Permian Basin, Odessa TX, USA.
Turid LiengenResearch Centre Porsgrunn, Statoil ASA, Herøya Industripark Porsgrunn, Norway.
Iwona BeechDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, NormanOK, USA; Institute for Energy and the Environment, University of Oklahoma, NormanOK, USA.
University of Oklahoma · USEquinor (Norway) · NOThe University of Texas of the Permian Basin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corrosion processes in two North Sea oil production pipelines were studied by analyzing pig envelope samples via metagenomic and metabolomic techniques. Both production systems have similar physico-chemical properties and injection waters are treated with nitrate, but one pipeline experiences severe corrosion and the other does not. Early and late pigging material was collected to gain insight into the potential causes for differential corrosion rates. Metabolites were extracted and analyzed via ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization (ESI) in both positive and negative ion modes. Metabolites were analyzed by comparison with standards indicative of aerobic and anaerobic hydrocarbon metabolism and by comparison to predicted masses for KEGG metabolites. Microbial community structure was analyzed via 16S rRNA gene qPCR, sequencing of 16S PCR products, and MySeq Illumina shotgun sequencing of community DNA. Metagenomic data were used to reconstruct the full length 16S rRNA genes and genomes of dominant microorganisms. Sequence data were also interrogated via KEGG annotation and for the presence of genes related to terminal electron accepting (TEA) processes as well as aerobic and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation. Significant and distinct differences were observed when comparing the 'high corrosion' (HC) and the 'low corrosion' (LC) pipeline systems, especially with respect to the TEA utilization potential. The HC samples were dominated by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and archaea known for their ability to utilize simple carbon substrates, whereas LC samples were dominated by pseudomonads with the genetic potential for denitrification and aerobic hydrocarbon degradation. The frequency of aerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes was low in the HC system, and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes were not detected in either pipeline. This is in contrast with metabolite analysis, which demonstrated the presence of several succinic acids in HC samples that are diagnostic of anaerobic hydrocarbon metabolism. Identifiable aerobic metabolites were confined to the LC samples, consistent with the metagenomic data. Overall, these data suggest that corrosion management might benefit from a more refined understanding of microbial community resilience in the face of disturbances such as nitrate treatment or pigging, which frequently prove insufficient to alter community structure toward a stable, less-corrosive assemblage.

Indexed as

anaerobic microbiologyhydrocarbon degradationmass spectrometrymetabolomicsmicrobially influenced corrosion (MIC)reservoir microbiology

Identifiers

PMID28197141
PMCPMC5281625
OpenAlexW2582749457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.