Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28196972›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antibiotics2017

Genus Kitasatospora, taxonomic features and diversity of secondary metabolites.

Yōko Takahashi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antibiotics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact ofEngineering microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yōko TakahashiKitasato Institute for Life Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Kitasatospora was proposed in 1982. Although Kitasatospora strains resemble Streptomyces strains in morphology, they are clearly different in cell-wall composition, as they contain both LL- and meso-diaminopimelic acid. Aerial and submerged spores contain LL-, while vegetative and submerged mycelia contain mainly meso- in their cell walls. Currently, 23 species have been validly proposed. Members of the genus Kitasatospora form a tight cluster and represent a legitimate genus distinct from Streptomyces on the basis of phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences. A variety of biologically active compounds have been found from Kitasatospora strains and structures of these compounds are extremely diverse. Genome sequences of 15 strains published so far are about 7-9 Mb in size and contain many genes governing secondary metabolites.

Indexed as

Cell WallGenome, BacterialPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSecondary MetabolismSequence Analysis, RNASpecies SpecificityStreptomycesStreptomycetaceaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28196972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.