Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28196844›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017

Cervical cancer incidence after normal cytological sample in routine screening using SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology: population based study.

Kirsten Rozemeijer, Steffie K Naber, Corine Penning, Lucy I H Overbeek, Caspar W N Looman, Inge M C M de Kok, Suzette M Matthijsse, Matejka Rebolj, Folkert J van Kemenade, Marjolein van Ballegooijen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Study on the Significance of Folate Receptor-Mediated Staining Solution (FRD) Staining in Screening High Grade Cervical Lesions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kirsten RozemeijerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Steffie K NaberDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands s.naber@erasmusmc.nl.
Corine PenningDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lucy I H OverbeekPALGA, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands, Houten, Netherlands.
Caspar W N LoomanDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Inge M C M de KokDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Suzette M MatthijsseDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Matejka ReboljClinical Research Centre and Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Folkert J van KemenadeDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marjolein van BallegooijenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CytodiagnosisUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningNetherlandsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28196844
PMCPMC5421440
OpenAlexW2589011600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.