Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28196634›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2017

Objective, domain-specific HER2 measurement in uterine and ovarian serous carcinomas and its clinical significance.

Daniel E Carvajal-Hausdorf, Kurt A Schalper, Yalai Bai, Jonathan Black, Alessandro D Santin, David L Rimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Spatial Mapping and Immunomodulatory Role of the OX40/OX40L Pathway in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Exceptional Response to Pembrolizumab in a Metastatic, Chemotherapy/Radiation-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patient Harboring a PD-L1-Genetic Rearrangement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel E Carvajal-HausdorfDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: daniel.carvajal@yale.edu.
Kurt A SchalperDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Translational Immuno-oncology Laboratory, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yalai BaiDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jonathan BlackDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Alessandro D SantinDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
David L RimmDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Integrated genomic analysis of racial disparities in endometrial cancerU01CA176067 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTIN, ALESSANDRO D · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHER2 overexpression/amplification is identified in up to 40% of uterine serous carcinomas (USC) and 10% of ovarian serous carcinomas (OSC). However, clinical trials using various HER2-targeted agents failed to show significant responses. FDA-approved HER2 assays target only the protein's intracellular domain (ICD) and not the extracellular domain (ECD). Previous quantitative studies in breast cancer by our group have shown that ICD of HER2 is expressed in some cases that do not express the HER2 ECD. We measured HER2 ICD and ECD in USC and OSC samples, and determined their relationship with clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival.

methodsWe measured HER2 ICD and ECD levels in 2 cohorts of USC and OSC comprising 102 and 175 patients, respectively. HER2 antibodies targeting ICD (CB11) and ECD (SP3) were validated and standardized using the AQUA® method of quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and a previously reported HER2 standardization tissue microarray (TMA). Objective, population-based cut-points were used to stratify patients according to HER2 ICD/ECD status.

resultsIn USC, 8% of patients with high HER2 ICD had low ECD levels (6/75 patients). In OSC, 42% of patients with high HER2 ICD had low ECD levels (29/69 patients). HER2 ICD/ECD status in USC and OSC was not significantly associated with major clinico-pathological features or survival.

conclusionUsing objective, domain-specific HER2 measurement, 8% of USC and 42% of OSC patients with high HER2 ICD levels do not show uniform overexpression of the ECD. This may be related to the presence of p95 HER2, an oncogenic fragment generated by full protein cleavage or alternative initiation of translation. These observations raise the possibility that USC/OSCs expressing low ECD despite being HER2-positive by ICD measurement, may benefit from therapies directed against the intracellular domain (e.g. lapatinib or afatinib) alone or in combination with extracellular domain-directed drugs (e.g. trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1).

Indexed as

Ado-Trastuzumab EmtansineAfatinibAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesExtracellular SpaceFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansIntracellular SpaceLapatinibMaytansineMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousOvarian NeoplasmsAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAfatinibAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinibMaytansinepertuzumabQuinazolinesTrastuzumabExtracellular domainHER2Intracellular domainQuantitative immunofluorescenceSerous carcinomaTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID28196634
PMCPMC5941302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.