Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28196512›Full record

ArticleTrials2017

A core outcome set for evaluating self-management interventions in people with comorbid diabetes and severe mental illness: study protocol for a modified Delphi study and systematic review.

Johanna Taylor, Jan R Böhnke, Judy Wright, Ian Kellar, Sarah L Alderson, Tom Hughes, Richard I G Holt, Najma Siddiqi

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna TaylorMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. jo.taylor@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-0900
Jan R BöhnkeMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Judy WrightLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
Ian KellarSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Sarah L AldersonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
Tom HughesLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, 2150 Century Way, Thorpe Park, Leeds, LS15 8ZB, UK.
Richard I G HoltDiabetes and Endocrinology, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Najma SiddiqiMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of York · GBBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1214-10002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with diabetes and comorbid severe mental illness (SMI) form a growing population at risk of increased mortality and morbidity compared to those with diabetes or SMI alone. There is increasing interest in interventions that target diabetes in SMI in order to help to improve physical health and reduce the associated health inequalities. However, there is a lack of consensus about which outcomes are important for this comorbid population, with trials differing in their focus on physical and mental health. A core outcome set, which includes outcomes across both conditions that are relevant to patients and other key stakeholders, is needed.

methodsThis study protocol describes methods to develop a core outcome set for use in effectiveness trials of self-management interventions for adults with comorbid type-2 diabetes and SMI. We will use a modified Delphi method to identify, rank, and agree core outcomes. This will comprise a two-round online survey and multistakeholder workshops involving patients and carers, health and social care professionals, health care commissioners, and other experts (e.g. academic researchers and third sector organisations). We will also select appropriate measurement tools for each outcome in the proposed core set and identify gaps in measures, where these exist. DISCUSSION: The proposed core outcome set will provide clear guidance about what outcomes should be measured, as a minimum, in trials of interventions for people with coexisting type-2 diabetes and SMI, and improve future synthesis of trial evidence in this area. We will also explore the challenges of using online Delphi methods for this hard-to-reach population, and examine differences in opinion about which outcomes matter to diverse stakeholder groups.

trial registrationCOMET registration: http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/911 . Registered on 1 July 2016.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMental DisordersSelf CareComorbidityCooperative BehaviorHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationResearch DesignRisk FactorsStakeholder ParticipationSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeBipolar disorderComorbidityComplex interventionsCore outcome setDiabetesPsychosisSchizophreniaSelf-managementSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID28196512
PMCPMC5309993
OpenAlexW2587855150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.