ArticleBMC biology2017
Long-term microfluidic tracking of coccoid cyanobacterial cells reveals robust control of division timing.
Article in BMC biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell imaging of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell cycle reveals linear and heterogenous growth.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
- Scaling of stochastic growth and division dynamics: A comparative study of individual rod-shaped cells in the Mother Machine and SChemostat platforms.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Single-Cell Study onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Coupling of growth rate and developmental tempo reduces body size heterogeneity in C. elegans.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Multiple timescales in bacterial growth homeostasis.iScience · 2022Article
- Characterizing non-exponential growth and bimodal cell size distributions in fission yeast: An analytical approach.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Single-cell growth inference ofeLife · 2021Article
- Microbial metabolic noise.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2021Review
- Cell Cycle Heritability and Localization Phase Transition in Growing Populations.Physical review letters · 2020Article
- Modeling homeostasis mechanisms that set the target cell size.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Plasticity of Cyanobacterial Thylakoid Microdomains Under Variable Light Conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Single cell ecology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Microfluidic time-lapse analysis and reevaluation of the Bacillus subtilis cell cycle.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis.Micromachines · 2019Article
- Successive Paradigm Shifts in the Bacterial Cell Cycle and Related Subjects.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Hidden heterogeneity and circadian-controlled cell fate inferred from single cell lineages.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Controlling organism size by regulating constituent cell numbers.Proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control · 2018Article
- Cell size control driven by the circadian clock and environment in cyanobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Size control in mammalian cells involves modulation of both growth rate and cell cycle duration.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Individuality and slow dynamics in bacterial growth homeostasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCyanobacteria are important agents in global carbon and nitrogen cycling and hold great promise for biotechnological applications. Model organisms such as Synechocystis sp. and Synechococcus sp. have advanced our understanding of photosynthetic capacity and circadian behavior, mostly using population-level measurements in which the behavior of individuals cannot be monitored. Synechocystis sp. cells are small and divide slowly, requiring long-term experiments to track single cells. Thus, the cumulative effects of drift over long periods can cause difficulties in monitoring and quantifying cell growth and division dynamics.
resultsTo overcome this challenge, we enhanced a microfluidic cell-culture device and developed an image analysis pipeline for robust lineage reconstruction. This allowed simultaneous tracking of many cells over multiple generations, and revealed that cells expand exponentially throughout their cell cycle. Generation times were highly correlated for sister cells, but not between mother and daughter cells. Relationships between birth size, division size, and generation time indicated that cell-size control was inconsistent with the "sizer" rule, where division timing is based on cell size, or the "timer" rule, where division occurs after a fixed time interval. Instead, single cell growth statistics were most consistent with the "adder" rule, in which division occurs after a constant increment in cell volume. Cells exposed to light-dark cycles exhibited growth and division only during the light period; dark phases pause but do not disrupt cell-cycle control.
conclusionsOur analyses revealed that the "adder" model can explain both the growth-related statistics of single Synechocystis cells and the correlation between sister cell generation times. We also observed rapid phenotypic response to light-dark transitions at the single cell level, highlighting the critical role of light in cyanobacterial cell-cycle control. Our findings suggest that by monitoring the growth kinetics of individual cells we can build testable models of circadian control of the cell cycle in cyanobacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.