Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28196076›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Patient safety incidents are common in primary care: A national prospective active incident reporting survey.

Philippe Michel, Jean Brami, Marc Chanelière, Marion Kret, Anne Mosnier, Isabelle Dupie, Anouk Haeringer-Cholet, Maud Keriel-Gascou, Claire Maradan, Frédéric Villebrun and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient and family engagement interventions in primary care patient safety: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The extent of interruptions to primary care medical officers' consultations in the Western Cape.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Effectiveness of New Tools to Define an Up-to-Date Patient Safety Risk Map: A Primary Care Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient safety in marginalised groups: a narrative scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2020
    Article
  19. Patient safety in primary and outpatient health care.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Philippe MichelComité de coordination de l'évaluation et de la qualité en Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8455-8332
Jean BramiHaute Autorité de santé, Saint Denis, France.
Marc ChanelièreDépartement de médecine générale, Université Lyon I, Lyon, France.
Marion KretComité de coordination de l'évaluation et de la qualité en Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France.
Anne MosnierOpen Rome et réseau des Grog, Paris, France.
Isabelle DupieMédecin généraliste, Paris, France.
Anouk Haeringer-CholetRéQua, Réseau qualité de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Maud Keriel-GascouDépartement de médecine générale, Université Lyon I, Lyon, France.
Claire MaradanAugustines' clinic, Malestroit, France.
Frédéric VillebrunAugustines' clinic, Malestroit, France.
Meredith MakehamAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jean-Luc QuenonComité de coordination de l'évaluation et de la qualité en Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study objectives were to describe the incidence and the nature of patient safety incidents (PSIs) in primary care general practice settings, and to explore the association between these incidents and practice or organizational characteristics.

methodsGPs, randomly selected from a national influenza surveillance network (n = 800) across France, prospectively reported any incidents observed each day over a one-week period between May and July 2013. An incident was an event or circumstance that could have resulted, or did result, in harm to a patient, which the GP would not wish to recur. Primary outcome was the incidence of PSIs which was determined by counting reports per total number of patient encounters. Reports were categorized using existing taxonomies. The association with practice and organizational characteristics was calculated using a negative binomial regression model.

results127 GPs (participation rate 79%) reported 317 incidents of which 270 were deemed to be a posteriori judged preventable, among 12,348 encounters. 77% had no consequences for the patient. The incidence of reported PSIs was 26 per 1000 patient encounters per week (95% CI [23‰ -28‰]). Incidents were three times more frequently related to the organization of healthcare than to knowledge and skills of health professionals, and especially to the workflow in the GPs' offices and to the communication between providers and with patients. Among GP characteristics, three were related with an increased incidence in the final multivariable model: length of consultation higher than 15 minutes, method of receiving radiological results (by fax compared to paper or email), and being in a multidisciplinary clinic compared with sole practitioners.

conclusionsPatient safety incidents (PSIs) occurred in mean once every two days in the sampled GPs and 2% of them were associated with a definite possibility for harm. Studying the association between organizational features of general practices and PSIs remains a major challenge and one of the most important issues for safety in primary care.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPrimary Health CareFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceMaleProspective StudiesRisk Management

Identifiers

PMID28196076
PMCPMC5308773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.