Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28195514›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2017

Blood-brain barrier-on-a-chip: Microphysiological systems that capture the complexity of the blood-central nervous system interface.

Duc Tt Phan, R Hugh F Bender, Jillian W Andrejecsk, Agua Sobrino, Stephanie J Hachey, Steven C George, Christopher Cw Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microphysiological systems to advance human pathophysiology and translational medicine.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Duc Tt Phan1 Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
R Hugh F Bender1 Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Jillian W Andrejecsk1 Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Agua Sobrino1 Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Stephanie J Hachey1 Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Steven C George2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Christopher Cw Hughes1 Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
University of California, Irvine · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Linking DDR2 expression, the cancer-associated fibroblast, and angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironmentUH3TR000481 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, STEVEN CARL · 2014 to 2016
$2.8M
MIcrophysiological systems to model vascular malformationsUH3HL141799 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER C. W. · 2019 to 2021
$2.3M
(PQD5) Development of in Vitro Vascularized Microtumors for Drug ScreeningR01CA180122 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER C. W. · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000481NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180122NCI NIH HHS R01 PQD5-CA180122NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL141799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier is a dynamic and highly organized structure that strictly regulates the molecules allowed to cross the brain vasculature into the central nervous system. The blood-brain barrier pathology has been associated with a number of central nervous system diseases, including vascular malformations, stroke/vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and various neurological tumors including glioblastoma multiforme. There is a compelling need for representative models of this critical interface. Current research relies heavily on animal models (mostly mice) or on two-dimensional (2D) in vitro models, neither of which fully capture the complexities of the human blood-brain barrier. Physiological differences between humans and mice make translation to the clinic problematic, while monolayer cultures cannot capture the inherently three-dimensional (3D) nature of the blood-brain barrier, which includes close association of the abluminal side of the endothelium with astrocyte foot-processes and pericytes. Here we discuss the central nervous system diseases associated with blood-brain barrier pathology, recent advances in the development of novel 3D blood-brain barrier -on-a-chip systems that better mimic the physiological complexity and structure of human blood-brain barrier, and provide an outlook on how these blood-brain barrier-on-a-chip systems can be used for central nervous system disease modeling. Impact statement The field of microphysiological systems is rapidly evolving as new technologies are introduced and our understanding of organ physiology develops. In this review, we focus on Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) models, with a particular emphasis on how they relate to neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, cancer, and vascular malformations. We emphasize the importance of capturing the three-dimensional nature of the brain and the unique architecture of the BBB - something that until recently had not been well modeled by in vitro systems. Our hope is that this review will provide a launch pad for new ideas and methodologies that can provide us with truly physiological BBB models capable of yielding new insights into the function of this critical interface.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierBrainEndothelium, VascularGlioblastomaHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrochip Analytical ProceduresMicrotechnologyModels, BiologicalMultiple SclerosisStrokeTissue EngineeringbraindiseasesendotheliumengineeringmodelsVascular

Identifiers

PMID28195514
PMCPMC5786363
OpenAlexW2588378751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.