Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28195392›Full record

ArticleProteomics2017

Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.

Paul A Stewart, Bin Fang, Robbert J C Slebos, Guolin Zhang, Adam L Borne, Katherine Fellows, Jamie K Teer, Y Ann Chen, Eric Welsh, Steven A Eschrich and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deep Learning Based MS2 Feature Detection for Data-Independent Shotgun Proteomics.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul A StewartThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Bin FangProteomics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Robbert J C SlebosThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Guolin ZhangThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Adam L BorneThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Katherine FellowsThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jamie K TeerBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Y Ann ChenBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eric WelshBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Steven A EschrichBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eric B HauraThoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
John M KoomenMolecular Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USMolecular Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Quantification of Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Kinase Expression in NSCLCR21CA169980 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI KOOMEN, JOHN M · 2013 to 2014
$398k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R21 CA169980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery proteomics experiments include many options for sample preparation and MS data acquisition, which are capable of creating datasets for quantifying thousands of proteins. To define a strategy that would produce a dataset with sufficient content while optimizing required resources, we compared (1) single-sample LC-MS/MS with data-dependent acquisition to single-sample LC-MS/MS with data-independent acquisition and (2) peptide fractionation with label-free (LF) quantification to peptide fractionation with relative quantification of chemically labeled peptides (sixplex tandem mass tags (TMT)). These strategies were applied to the same set of four frozen lung squamous cell carcinomas and four adjacent tissues, and the overall outcomes of each experiment were assessed. We identified 6656 unique protein groups with LF, 5535 using TMT, 3409 proteins from single-sample analysis with data-independent acquisition, and 2219 proteins from single-sample analysis with data-dependent acquisition. Pathway analysis indicated the number of proteins per pathway was proportional to the total protein identifications from each method, suggesting limited biological bias between experiments. The results suggest the use of single-sample experiments as a rapid tissue assessment tool and digestion quality control or as a technique to maximize output from limited samples and use of TMT or LF quantification as methods for larger amounts of tumor tissue with the selection being driven mainly by instrument time limitations. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifiers PXD004682, PXD004683, PXD004684, and PXD005733.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellChromatography, LiquidHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm ProteinsPeptidesProteomeProteomicsStaining and LabelingTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsPeptidesProteomeData-independent acquisitionDiscovery proteomicsLabel-free quantificationLung squamous cell carcinomaTMT

Identifiers

PMID28195392
PMCPMC5606153
OpenAlexW2589013025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.