Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28195037›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Generalizable knowledge outweighs incidental details in prefrontal ensemble code over time.

Mark D Morrissey, Nathan Insel, Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lateral Entorhinal Cortex Suppresses Drift in Cortical Memory Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prefrontal Neural Ensembles Develop Selective Code for Stimulus Associations within Minutes of Novel Experiences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark D MorrisseyDepartment of Psychology, University or Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Nathan InselDepartment of Psychology, University or Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kaori Takehara-NishiuchiDepartment of Psychology, University or Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7282-7838
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories for recent experiences are rich in incidental detail, but with time the brain is thought to extract latent rules and structures common across past experiences. We show that over weeks following the acquisition of two distinct associative memories, neuron firing in the rat prelimbic prefrontal cortex (mPFC) became less selective for perceptual features unique to each association and, with an apparently different time-course, became more selective for common relational features. We further found that during exposure to a novel experimental context, memory expression and neuron selectivity for relational features immediately generalized to the new situation. These neural patterns offer a window into the network-level processes by which the mPFC develops a knowledge structure of the world that can be adaptively applied to new experiences.

Indexed as

MemoryAnimalsNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRatsTime Factorscortical memoryelectrophysiologymemory consolidationneuroscienceprefrontal cortexrat

Identifiers

PMID28195037
PMCPMC5308892
OpenAlexW2588444730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.