ArticleJournal of paediatrics and child health2017
Decision-making at the borderline of viability: Who should decide and on what basis?
Article in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
- Scandinavian perspectives on life support at the border of viability.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Extremely premature birth bioethical decision-making supported by dialogics and pragmatism.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Neonatologists' decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies-a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Neonatology in Austria: ethics to improve practice.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2020Article
- Professional ethics: the case of neonatology.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019Article
- Thresholds for Resuscitation of Extremely Preterm Infants in the UK, Sweden, and Netherlands.Pediatrics · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Parents and medical staff usually agree on the management of preterm labour at borderline viability, when there is a relatively high risk of long-term neurodevelopmental problems in survivors. If delivery is imminent and parents and staff cannot agree on the best management, however, who should decide what will happen when the baby is delivered? Should the baby be resuscitated? Should intensive care be initiated? Three ethicists, one of whom is also a neonatologist, discuss this complex issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.