Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194565›Full record

ArticlePlanta2017

Transgenic papaya: a useful platform for oral vaccines.

Gladis Fragoso, Marisela Hernández, Jacquelynne Cervantes-Torres, Rubén Ramírez-Aquino, Héctor Chapula, Nelly Villalobos, René Segura-Velázquez, Alfredo Figueroa, Iván Flores, Herminio Jiménez and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Infection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Improvement of cell suspension cultures of transformed and untransformedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gladis FragosoInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marisela HernándezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jacquelynne Cervantes-TorresInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rubén Ramírez-AquinoFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2702, CP 72420, Puebla, Mexico.
Héctor ChapulaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Nelly VillalobosFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
René Segura-VelázquezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alfredo FigueroaUnidad Académica de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Av. Lázaro Cárdenas s/n, CP 39087, Chilpancingo, GRO, Mexico.
Iván FloresFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, CP 62209, Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico.
Herminio JiménezFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2702, CP 72420, Puebla, Mexico.
Laura AdalidInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, SSA, Colonia la Fama, Delegación Tlalpan, Mexico, DF, Mexico.
Gabriela RosasFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, CP 62209, Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico.
Luis GalvezFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2702, CP 72420, Puebla, Mexico.
Elias PezzatFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2702, CP 72420, Puebla, Mexico.
Elizabeth Monreal-EscalanteLaboratorio de Biofarmacéuticos Recombinantes, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava 6, 78210, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Sergio Rosales-MendozaLaboratorio de Biofarmacéuticos Recombinantes, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava 6, 78210, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Luis G VazquezFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2702, CP 72420, Puebla, Mexico.
Edda SciuttoInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. edda@unam.mx.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MXAutonomous University of San Luis Potosí · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MXInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionTransgenic papaya callus lines expressing the components of the S3Pvac vaccine constitute a stable platform to produce an oral vaccine against cysticercosis caused by Taenia solium or T. crassiceps. The development of effective delivery systems to cope with the reduced immunogenicity of new subunit vaccines is a priority in vaccinology. Herein, experimental evidence supporting a papaya-based platform to produce needle-free, recombinant, highly immunogenic vaccines is shown. Papaya (Carica papaya) callus lines were previously engineered by particle bombardment to express the three protective peptides of the S3Pvac anti-cysticercosis vaccine (KETc7, KETc12, KETc1). Calli were propagated in vitro, and a stable integration and expression of the target genes has been maintained, as confirmed by PCR, qRT-PCR, and HPLC. These results point papaya calli as a suitable platform for long-term transgenic expression of the vaccine peptides. The previously demonstrated protective immunogenic efficacy of S3Pvac-papaya orally administered to mice is herein confirmed in a wider dose-range and formulated with different delivery vehicles, adequate for oral vaccination. This protection is accompanied by an increase in anti-S3Pvac antibody titers and a delayed hypersensitivity response against the vaccine. A significant increase in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte proliferation was induced in vitro by each vaccine peptide in mice immunized with the lowest dose of S3Pvac papaya (0.56 ng of the three peptides in 0.1 µg of papaya callus total protein per mouse). In pigs, the obliged intermediate host for Taenia solium, S3Pvac papaya was also immunogenic when orally administered in a two-log dose range. Vaccinated pigs significantly increased anti-vaccine antibodies and mononuclear cell proliferation. Overall, the oral immunogenicity of this stable S3Pvac-papaya vaccine in mice and pigs, not requiring additional adjuvants, supports the interest in papaya callus as a useful platform for plant-based vaccines.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAntigens, HelminthCaricaCysticercosisFemaleImmunizationMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlants, Genetically ModifiedSwineSwine DiseasesTaenia soliumVaccines, SyntheticAntigens, HelminthVaccines, SyntheticCysticercosisEmbryogenic callusOral vaccineTaenia crassicepsTaenia solium

Identifiers

PMID28194565
OpenAlexW2588409628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.