ArticleInvestigational new drugs2017
Phase I trial of MEK 1/2 inhibitor pimasertib combined with mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01378377 (Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of MEK1/2 Inhibitor MSC1936369B Combined With Temsirolimus in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of MEK1/2 Inhibitor MSC1936369B Combined With Temsirolimus in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melanoma: Pathogenesis and Targeted Therapy.MedComm · 2026Review
- The mTORC2 signaling network: targets and cross-talks.The Biochemical journal · 2024Review
- Targeting RAS mutants in malignancies: successes, failures, and reasons for hope.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2023Review
- Review
- Oncogenic KRAS blockade therapy: renewed enthusiasm and persistent challenges.Molecular cancer · 2021Review
- TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Phase Ib Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Copanlisib Combined with the Allosteric MEK Inhibitor Refametinib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2020Article
- Review
- Activation of the IGF Axis in Thyroid Cancer: Implications for Tumorigenesis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- New Horizons inFrontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- A phase Ib dose-escalation and expansion study of the oral MEK inhibitor pimasertib and PI3K/MTOR inhibitor voxtalisib in patients with advanced solid tumours.British journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Pharmacology of Pimasertib, A Selective MEK1/2 Inhibitor.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2018Review
- Therapeutic opportunities for pain medicines via targeting of specific translation signaling mechanisms.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Dual inhibition of activated MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways may enhance the antitumor efficacy of the MEK 1/2 inhibitor pimasertib and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus given in combination. Methods In this phase I study, patients with refractory advanced solid tumors (NCT01378377) received once-weekly temsirolimus plus once-daily oral pimasertib in 21-day cycles in a modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pimasertib in combination with temsirolimus, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) were investigated. Results Of 33 patients evaluated, all experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 31 had treatment-related TEAEs, most frequently stomatitis and thrombocytopenia. TEAEs were reversible. No deaths were attributed to treatment. Nine patients had dose-limiting toxicities (stomatitis, thrombocytopenia, serum creatinine phosphokinase increase, visual impairment) and the MTD was determined as 45 mg/day pimasertib plus 25 mg/week temsirolimus. However, due to overlapping toxicities no further investigations were performed and the RP2D was not defined. PK profiles of both agents were not adversely affected. Seventeen patients (17/26 patients) had a best response of stable disease; five had stable disease lasting >12 weeks. Conclusions The RP2D was not defined and the pimasertib plus temsirolimus combination investigated did not warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.