Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194530›Full record

SynthesisOral and maxillofacial surgery2017

Application of selected scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a systematic review.

Sepanta Hosseinpour, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie, Maryam Rezai Rad, Mohammad Taghi Baghani, Saeed Reza Motamedian, Arash Khojasteh

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent Advances in Scaffolds for Guided Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Computer-aided designed 3D-printed polymeric scaffolds for personalized reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular defects: a proof-of-concept study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A ComparativeFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Biomimetic Aspects of Oral and Dentofacial Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sepanta HosseinpourSchool of Dentistry, Students' Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mitra Ghazizadeh AhsaieSchool of Dentistry, Students' Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam Rezai RadDental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Research, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Taghi BaghaniDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed Reza MotamedianProsthodontics Department, Dental School, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash KhojastehDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. arashkhojasteh@yahoo.com.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahed University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current systematic review investigated the results of application of some of the most commonly used scaffolds in conjugation with stem cells and growth factors in animal and clinical studies.

methodsA comprehensive electronic search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in NCBI PMC and PubMed from January 1970 to December 2015 limited to English language publications with available full texts. In vivo studies in relation to "bone healing," "bone regeneration," and at least one of the following items were investigated: allograft, β-tricalcium phosphate, deproteinized bovine bone mineral, hydroxyapetite/tricalcium phosphate, nanohydroxyapatite, and composite scaffolds.

resultsA total of 1252 articles were reviewed, and 46 articles completely fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this study. The highest bone regeneration has been achieved when combination of all three elements, given scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells, and growth factors, were used. Among studies being reported in this review, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are the most studied mesenchymal stem cells, β-tricalcium phosphate is the most frequently used scaffold, and platelet-rich plasma is the most commonly used growth factor.

conclusionThe current review aimed to inform reconstructive surgeons of how combinations of various mesenchymal stem cells, scaffolds, and growth factors enhance bone regeneration. The highest bone regeneration has been achieved when combination of all three elements, given scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells, and growth factors, were used.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAllograftsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCalcification, PhysiologicCalcium PhosphatesHumansHydroxyapatitesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNanostructuresStem Cell TransplantationTissue EngineeringVascularized Composite Allotransplantationbeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium Phosphateshydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphateHydroxyapatitesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsBone tissue engineeringGrowth factorHA/TCPProgenitor/stem cellsScaffoldβ-TCP

Identifiers

PMID28194530
OpenAlexW2587947380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.