Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194526›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2017

Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group.

Yuzuru Tamaru, Shiro Oka, Shinji Tanaka, Shinji Nagata, Yuko Hiraga, Toshio Kuwai, Akira Furudoi, Tadamasa Tamura, Masaki Kunihiro, Hideharu Okanobu and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. [Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020
    Guideline
  10. Guideline
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yuzuru TamaruDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Shiro OkaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. oka4683@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Shinji TanakaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinji NagataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuko HiragaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toshio KuwaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan.
Akira FurudoiDepartment of Gastroenterology, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tadamasa TamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hiroshimakinen Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masaki KunihiroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hideharu OkanobuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chugoku Rosai Hospital, Kure, Japan.
Koichi NakadoiDepartment of Gastroenterology, JA Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Japan.
Hiroyuki KanaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Makoto HigashiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shobara Red Cross Hospital, Shobara, Japan.
Koji ArihiroDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazuya KuraokaDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan.
Fumio ShimamotoFaculty of Humanities, Hiroshima Shudo University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazuaki ChayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) after endoscopic resection (ER) and surgical resection.

methodsWe examined T1 CRC patients treated during 1992-2008 and who had ≥5 years of follow-up. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria after ER according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines were defined as "non-endoscopically curable" and classified into three groups: ER alone (Group A: 121 patients), additional surgery after ER (Group B: 238 patients), and surgical resection alone (Group C: 342 patients). Long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrence were analyzed.

resultsOf the 882 patients with T1 CRC, 701 were non-endoscopically curable. Among these patients, recurrence and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 0.6 and 91.1%, respectively. In Groups A, B, and C, recurrence rates were 5.0, 5.5, and 3.8%, OS rates were 79.3, 92.4, and 91.5% (p < 0.01), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 98.1, 97.9, and 98.5%, respectively. Thirty-two patients experienced local recurrence or distant/lymph node metastasis (Group A: 6; Group B: 13; Group C: 13) and 14 patients died of primary CRC (Group A: 3; Group B: 7; Group C: 4). Age ≥65 years, protruded gross type, positive lymphatic invasion, and high budding grade were significant predictors of recurrence in non-endoscopically curable patients.

conclusionsOur findings supported the JSCCR criteria for endoscopically curable T1 CRC. ER for T1 CRC did not worsen the clinical outcomes of patients who required additional surgical resection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRecurrenceT1 colorectal carcinomaTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.