Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194374›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia

Regenerative potential of the cartilaginous tissue in mesenchymal stem cells: update, limitations, and challenges.

Ivana Beatrice Mânica da Cruz, Antônio Lourenço Severo, Verônica Farina Azzolin, Luiz Filipe Machado Garcia, André Kuhn, Osvandré Lech

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Treatment of Chondral Lesions in the Knee.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dental Pulp Stem Cell-Derived Secretome and Its Regenerative Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Insights into inflammatory priming of mesenchymal stromal cells: functional biological impacts.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivana Beatrice Mânica da CruzUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Laboratório de Biogenômica, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Antônio Lourenço SeveroUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Verônica Farina AzzolinUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Laboratório de Biogenômica, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Luiz Filipe Machado GarciaUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Laboratório de Biogenômica, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
André KuhnUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Osvandré LechUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in the studies with adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have turned tissue regenerative therapy into a promising tool in many areas of medicine. In orthopedics, one of the main challenges has been the regeneration of cartilage tissue, mainly in diarthroses. In the induction of the MSCs, in addition to cytodifferentiation, the microenvironmental context of the tissue to be regenerated and an appropriate spatial arrangement are extremely important factors. Furthermore, it is known that MSC differentiation is fundamentally determined by mechanisms such as cell proliferation (mitosis), biochemical-molecular interactions, movement, cell adhesion, and apoptosis. Although the use of MSCs for cartilage regeneration remains at a research level, there are important questions to be resolved in order to make this therapy efficient and safe. It is known, for instance, that the expansion of chondrocytes in cultivation, needed to increase the number of cells, could end up producing fibrocartilage instead of hyaline cartilage. However, the latest results are promising. In 2014, the first stage I/II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular injection of MSCs in femorotibial cartilage regeneration was published, indicating a decrease in injured areas. One issue to be explored is how many modifications in the articulate inflammatory environment could induce differentiation of MSCs already allocated in that region. Such issue arose from studies that suggested that the suppression of the inflammation may increase the efficiency of tissue regeneration. Considering the complexity of the events related to the chondrogenesis and cartilage repair, it can be concluded that the road ahead is still long, and that further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Cartilaginous tissueRegenerative potentialStem cells

Identifiers

PMID28194374
PMCPMC5290078
OpenAlexW2560170877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.