Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194324›Full record

ReviewAnalytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam)2017

Cell Therapies in Cardiomyopathy: Current Status of Clinical Trials.

Ming Hao, Richard Wang, Wen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cortical bone-derived stem cell therapy reduces apoptosis after myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cardiac stem cell trials and the new world of cellular reprogramming: Time to move on.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Thrombospondins: A Role in Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming HaoCellular Biomedicine Group, 333 Guiping Road, Shanghai 200233, China; Cellular Biomedicine Group, 19925 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 100, Cupertino, CA 95014, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-8780
Richard WangCellular Biomedicine Group, 333 Guiping Road, Shanghai 200233, China; Cellular Biomedicine Group, 19925 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 100, Cupertino, CA 95014, USA.
Wen WangCellular Biomedicine Group, 333 Guiping Road, Shanghai 200233, China; Cellular Biomedicine Group, 19925 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 100, Cupertino, CA 95014, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3215-3020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the human heart has limited potential for regeneration, the loss of cardiomyocytes during cardiac myopathy and ischaemic injury can result in heart failure and death. Stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of dead myocardium, directly or indirectly, and seems to offer functional benefits to patients. The ideal candidate donor cell for myocardial reconstitution is a stem-like cell that can be easily obtained, has a robust proliferation capacity and a low risk of tumour formation and immune rejection, differentiates into functionally normal cardiomyocytes, and is suitable for minimally invasive clinical transplantation. The ultimate goal of cardiac repair is to regenerate functionally viable myocardium after myocardial infarction (MI) to prevent or heal heart failure. This review provides a comprehensive overview of treatment with stem-like cells in preclinical and clinical studies to assess the feasibility and efficacy of this novel therapeutic strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathiesClinical Trials as TopicHumansStem CellsStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID28194324
PMCPMC5282433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.