Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194274›Full record

ArticleJournal of therapeutic ultrasound2017

Moderate-to-deep sedation technique, using propofol and ketamine, allowing synchronised breathing for magnetic resonance high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment for uterine fibroids: a pilot study.

Hermanus H B Vaessen, F M Knuttel, J M M van Breugel, M E Ikink, J M Dieleman, M A A J van den Bosch, J T A Knape

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of therapeutic ultrasound, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hermanus H B VaessenDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Huispostnr.: F 04.5.16, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F M KnuttelDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J M M van BreugelDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M E IkinkDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J M DielemanDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Huispostnr.: F 04.5.16, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M A A J van den BoschDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J T A KnapeDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Huispostnr.: F 04.5.16, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment for uterine fibroids is rapidly gaining popularity as a treatment modality. This procedure is generally uncomfortable, painful, and requires minimal or absence of movement and an MR-HIFU synchronised breathing pattern of the patient. Procedural sedation and analgesia protocols have become the standard practice in interventional radiology departments worldwide. The aim of this study was to explore if a sedation regimen with low-dose propofol and ketamine performed by trained non-medical sedation practitioners could result in relief of discomfort for the patient and in adequate working conditions for MR-HIFU treatment for uterine fibroids.

methodsIn this study, conducted from August 2013 until November 2014, 20 patients were subjected to MR-HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids. Patients were deeply sedated using intravenous propofol and esketamine according to a standardised hospital protocol to allow synchronisation of the breathing pattern to the MR-HIFU. The quality of sedation for MR-HIFU and complications were recorded and analysed. The side effects of the sedation technique, the propofol and esketamine consumption rate, the duration of recovery, and patient satisfaction after 24 h were examined.

resultsA total of 20 female patients (mean age 42.4 [range 32-53] years) were enrolled. Mean propofol/esketamine dose was 1309 mg/39.5 mg (range 692-1970 mg/ 23.6-87.9 mg). Mean procedure time was 269 min (range 140-295 min). Application of the sedation protocol resulted in a regular breathing pattern, which could be synchronised with the MR-HIFU procedures without delay. The required treatment was completed in all cases. There were no major adverse events. Hypoxemia (oxygen desaturation <92%) and hallucinations were not observed.

conclusionsThe use of a specific combination of IV propofol and esketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia reduced the discomfort and pain during MR-guided HIFU treatments of uterine fibroids. The resulting regular breathing pattern allowed for easy synchronisation of the MR-HIFU procedure. Based on our results, esketamine and propofol sedation performed by trained non-medical sedation practitioners is feasible and safe, has a low risk of major adverse events, and has a short recovery time, avoiding a session of general anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Deep propofol and esketamine sedationHallucinations and sedation-related complicationsMR-HIFU uterine fibroids treatmentSafety

Identifiers

PMID28194274
PMCPMC5299783
OpenAlexW2580707514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.