Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194165›Full record

ArticleEURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology2014

Unbiased bootstrap error estimation for linear discriminant analysis.

Thang Vu, Chao Sima, Ulisses M Braga-Neto, Edward R Dougherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thang VuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3128 TAMU, College Station, 77843 TX USA.
Chao SimaCenter for Bioinformatics and Genomic Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, 101 Gateway, Suite A, College Station, 77845 TX USA.
Ulisses M Braga-NetoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3128 TAMU, College Station, 77843 TX USA.
Edward R DoughertyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3128 TAMU, College Station, 77843 TX USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convex bootstrap error estimation is a popular tool for classifier error estimation in gene expression studies. A basic question is how to determine the weight for the convex combination between the basic bootstrap estimator and the resubstitution estimator such that the resulting estimator is unbiased at finite sample sizes. The well-known 0.632 bootstrap error estimator uses asymptotic arguments to propose a fixed 0.632 weight, whereas the more recent 0.632+ bootstrap error estimator attempts to set the weight adaptively. In this paper, we study the finite sample problem in the case of linear discriminant analysis under Gaussian populations. We derive exact expressions for the weight that guarantee unbiasedness of the convex bootstrap error estimator in the univariate and multivariate cases, without making asymptotic simplifications. Using exact computation in the univariate case and an accurate approximation in the multivariate case, we obtain the required weight and show that it can deviate significantly from the constant 0.632 weight, depending on the sample size and Bayes error for the problem. The methodology is illustrated by application on data from a well-known cancer classification study.

Indexed as

BiasBootstrapError estimationGene expression classificationLinear discriminant analysis

Identifiers

PMID28194165
PMCPMC5270504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.