Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194146›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Modulation of Replicative Lifespan in

Tejas Bouklas, Neena Jain, Bettina C Fries

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Systematic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mixed infection byMedical mycology case reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Contributions of a Histone Deacetylase (SirT2/Hst2) toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Low Glucose Mediated Fluconazole Tolerance inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Replicative Aging in Pathogenic Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tejas BouklasDepartment of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases), Stony Brook University, Stony BrookNY, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Long Island University-Post, BrookvilleNY, USA.
Neena JainDepartment of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases), Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx NY, USA.
Bettina C FriesDepartment of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases), Stony Brook University, Stony BrookNY, USA; Department of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases), Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, BronxNY, USA; Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony BrookNY, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, BronxNY, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USLong Island University · US

Funding

response to phenotypic switch variants to C. neoformansR01AI059681 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FRIES, BETTINA · 2004 to 2014
$3.6M
Investigation on Replicative aging in Cryptococcus neoformans populationsR01AI127704 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FRIES, BETTINA · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059681NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungal pathogen,

Indexed as

agingfunguspathogenpersistencesirtuinvirulence

Identifiers

PMID28194146
PMCPMC5276861
OpenAlexW2581958671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.