Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28194103›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017

Reassessment of Non-Monosynaptic Excitation from the Motor Cortex to Motoneurons in Single Motor Units of the Human Biceps Brachii.

Tsuyoshi Nakajima, Toshiki Tazoe, Masanori Sakamoto, Takashi Endoh, Satoshi Shibuya, Leonardo A Elias, Rinaldo A Mezzarane, Tomoyoshi Komiyama, Yukari Ohki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Loud Sounds Produces Plastic Changes in Motor Output.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence for Subcortical Plasticity after Paired Stimulation from a Wearable Device.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tsuyoshi NakajimaDivision of Sports and Health Science, Chiba UniversityChiba, Japan; Department of Integrative Physiology, Kyorin University School of MedicineTokyo, Japan.
Toshiki TazoeDivision of Sports and Health Science, Chiba UniversityChiba, Japan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of PittsburghPittsburgh, PA, USA.
Masanori SakamotoDivision of Sports and Health Science, Chiba UniversityChiba, Japan; Faculty of Education, Department of Physical Education, Kumamoto UniversityKumamoto, Japan.
Takashi EndohDivision of Sports and Health Science, Chiba UniversityChiba, Japan; Faculty of Child Development and Education, Uekusa Gakuen UniversityChiba, Japan.
Satoshi ShibuyaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine Tokyo, Japan.
Leonardo A EliasNeural Engineering Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil; Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Escola Politecnica, Departamento de Engenharia de Telecomunicações e Controle (PTC), University of Sao PauloSao Paulo, Brazil.
Rinaldo A MezzaraneDivision of Sports and Health Science, Chiba UniversityChiba, Japan; Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Escola Politecnica, Departamento de Engenharia de Telecomunicações e Controle (PTC), University of Sao PauloSao Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Signal Processing and Motor Control, College of Physical Education, University of BrasíliaBrasília, Brazil.
Tomoyoshi KomiyamaDivision of Sports and Health Science, Chiba University Chiba, Japan.
Yukari OhkiDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine Tokyo, Japan.
Chiba University · JPKyorin University · JPUekusa Gakuen University · JPUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corticospinal excitation is mediated by polysynaptic pathways in several vertebrates, including dexterous monkeys. However, indirect non-monosynaptic excitation has not been clearly observed following transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) or cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS) in humans. The present study evaluated indirect motor pathways in normal human subjects by recording the activities of single motor units (MUs) in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle. The pyramidal tract was stimulated with weak TES, CMS, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) contralateral to the recording side. During tasks involving weak co-contraction of the BB and hand muscles, all stimulation methods activated MUs with short latencies. Peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) showed that responses with similar durations were induced by TES (1.9 ± 1.4 ms) and CMS (2.0 ± 1.4 ms), and these responses often showed multiple peaks with the PSTH peak having a long duration (65.3% and 44.9%, respectively). Such long-duration excitatory responses with multiple peaks were rarely observed in the finger muscles following TES or in the BB following stimulation of the Ia fibers. The responses obtained with TES were compared in the same 14 BB MUs during the co-contraction and isolated BB contraction tasks. Eleven and three units, respectively, exhibited activation with multiple peaks during the two tasks. In order to determine the dispersion effects on the axon conduction velocities (CVs) and synaptic noise, a simulation study that was comparable to the TES experiments was performed with a biologically plausible neuromuscular model. When the model included the monosynaptic-pyramidal tract, multiple peaks were obtained in about 34.5% of the motoneurons (MNs). The experimental and simulation results indicated the existence of task-dependent disparate inputs from the pyramidal tract to the MNs of the upper limb. These results suggested that intercalated interneurons are present in the spinal cord and that these interneurons might be equivalent to those identified in animal experiments.

Indexed as

humansmotor unitprimary motor cortex (M1)pyramidal tracttranscranial electrical stimulation (TES)transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID28194103
PMCPMC5276998
OpenAlexW2580111089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.