Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28193997›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Stepwise reprogramming of liver cells to a pancreas progenitor state by the transcriptional regulator Tgif2.

Nuria Cerdá-Esteban, Heike Naumann, Silvia Ruzittu, Nancy Mah, Igor M Pongrac, Corinna Cozzitorto, Angela Hommel, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro, Ezio Bonifacio, Francesca M Spagnoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Direct Reprogramming of Somatic Cells into Induced β-Cells: An Overview.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Art of Reprogramming for Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nuria Cerdá-EstebanLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Basis of Embryonic Development, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Heike NaumannLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Basis of Embryonic Development, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Silvia RuzittuLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Basis of Embryonic Development, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Nancy MahComputational Biology and Data Mining, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Igor M PongracLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Basis of Embryonic Development, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Corinna CozzitortoLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Basis of Embryonic Development, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Angela HommelDFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscher Straße 105, Dresden 01307, Germany.
Miguel A Andrade-NavarroComputational Biology and Data Mining, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Ezio BonifacioDFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscher Straße 105, Dresden 01307, Germany.
Francesca M SpagnoliLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Basis of Embryonic Development, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Max Delbrück Center · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a successful lineage reprogramming strategy of liver to pancreas holds promises for the treatment and potential cure of diabetes. The liver is an ideal tissue source for generating pancreatic cells, because of its close developmental origin with the pancreas and its regenerative ability. Yet, the molecular bases of hepatic and pancreatic cellular plasticity are still poorly understood. Here, we report that the TALE homeoprotein TGIF2 acts as a developmental regulator of the pancreas versus liver fate decision and is sufficient to elicit liver-to-pancreas fate conversion both ex vivo and in vivo. Hepatocytes expressing Tgif2 undergo extensive transcriptional remodelling, which represses the original hepatic identity and, over time, induces a pancreatic progenitor-like phenotype. Consistently, in vivo forced expression of Tgif2 activates pancreatic progenitor genes in adult mouse hepatocytes. This study uncovers the reprogramming activity of TGIF2 and suggests a stepwise reprogramming paradigm, whereby a 'lineage-restricted' dedifferentiation step precedes the identity switch.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHepatocytesHomeodomain ProteinsLiverMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicPancreasRepressor ProteinsStem CellsHomeodomain ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTG-interacting factor 2, mouse

Identifiers

PMID28193997
PMCPMC5316826
OpenAlexW2588909578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.