ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017
Thresholds and noise limitations of colour vision in dim light.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial light at night alters foraging behavior of freshwater amphipods depending on the light spectrum and the presence of predation cues.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Adaptations of the Vertebrate Retina to Low-Light Conditions: A Review.Anatomia, histologia, embryologia · 2025Review
- Trichromacy and ultraviolet vision in a nocturnal marsupial.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nocturnal camouflage through background matching against moonlight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Horse vision through two lenses: Tinbergen's Four Questions and the Five Domains.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- The function and consequences of fluorescence in tetrapods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Migratory birds are able to choose the appropriate migratory direction under dim yellow narrowband light.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Functional characterization of four opsins and two G alpha subtypes co-expressed in the molluscan rhabdomeric photoreceptor.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Dim-light colour vision in the facultatively nocturnal Asian giant honeybee,Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Decision rules for egg-color-based rejection by two cavity-nesting hosts of the brown-headed cowbird.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- OSpRad: an open-source, low-cost, high-sensitivity spectroradiometer.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Corneal endothelial transplantation from bench to bedside: A review of animal models and their translational value for therapeutic development.Experimental eye research · 2022Review
- Colour vision in nocturnal insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- Visual attraction of the European tarnished plant bug Lygus rugulipennis (Hemiptera: Miridae) to a water trap with LED light in chrysanthemum greenhouses and olfactory attraction to novel compounds in Y-tube tests.Pest management science · 2022Article
- Insect visual sensitivity to long wavelengths enhances colour contrast of insects against vegetation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Illumination and gaze effects on face evaluation: The Bi-AGI database.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Incongruence in Lighting Impairs Face Identification.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Impact of the Spectral Radiation Environment on the Maximum Absorption Wavelengths of Human Vision and Other Species.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Evolutionary adaptation of visual pigments in geckos for their photic environment.Science advances · 2021Article
- Do I stay or do I go? Shifts in perch use by lizards during morning twilight suggest anticipatory behaviour.Biology letters · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colour discrimination is based on opponent photoreceptor interactions, and limited by receptor noise. In dim light, photon shot noise impairs colour vision, and in vertebrates, the absolute threshold of colour vision is set by dark noise in cones. Nocturnal insects (e.g. moths and nocturnal bees) and vertebrates lacking rods (geckos) have adaptations to reduce receptor noise and use chromatic vision even in very dim light. In contrast, vertebrates with duplex retinae use colour-blind rod vision when noisy cone signals become unreliable, and their transition from cone- to rod-based vision is marked by the Purkinje shift. Rod-cone interactions have not been shown to improve colour vision in dim light, but may contribute to colour vision in mesopic light intensities. Frogs and toads that have two types of rods use opponent signals from these rods to control phototaxis even at their visual threshold. However, for tasks such as prey or mate choice, their colour discrimination abilities fail at brighter light intensities, similar to other vertebrates, probably limited by the dark noise in cones.This article is part of the themed issue 'Vision in dim light'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.