ArticleCirculation2017
Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).
Article in Circulation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serious adverse events in patients with target-oriented blood pressure management: a systematic review.Journal of hypertension · 2019Pooled it
- Association between single-pill combination therapy use and blood pressure control in the Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Intervention Trial: a post hoc analysis.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Trial
- Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes Across Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stages: A Post Hoc Analysis of the China Rural Hypertension Control Project.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Association of baseline eGFR and incident heart failure on patients receiving intensive blood pressure treatment.ESC heart failure · 2025Trial
- Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Trial
- Single-Pill Combination Product Availability of the Antihypertensive Regimens Used for Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Trial
- Evidence for Age Bias Contributing to Therapeutic Inertia in Blood Pressure Management: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Trial
- Implementing a home-based virtual hypertension programme-a pilot feasibility study.Family practice · 2023Trial
- Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Trial
- Applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) in the Chinese population: A cost-effectiveness modeling study.PLoS medicine · 2021Trial
- Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on All-Cause Hospitalizations.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2020Trial
- Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Acute Declines in Renal Function during Intensive BP Lowering and Long-Term Risk of Death.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018Trial
- Relationships Matter: Exploring the Impact of Patients' Familial, Community, and Provider Relationships on Hypertension Management.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Organizational Determinants to Hypertension Management: Adapting a Health Equity Framework to Examine Processes at Two Academic Health Systems.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- SPRINT Treatment Among Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease From 2 Large Health Care Systems.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The potential impact of optimal blood pressure treatment intensity to reduce disparities in dementia between Black and White individuals.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Observational
- Association of ultra-processed foods consumption with increased liver steatosis in U.S. adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Annual Cost of Implementing Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Goals in the United States.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Effect of Population-Level Blood Pressure Treatment Strategies on Cardiovascular and Cognitive Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) demonstrated a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal of <120 versus <140 mm Hg among US adults at high cardiovascular disease risk but without diabetes mellitus, stroke, or heart failure. To quantify the potential benefits and risks of SPRINT intensive goal implementation, we estimated the deaths prevented and excess serious adverse events incurred if the SPRINT intensive SBP treatment goal were implemented in all eligible US adults.
methodsSPRINT eligibility criteria were applied to the 1999 to 2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and linked with the National Death Index through December 2011. SPRINT eligibility included age ≥50 years, SBP of 130 to 180 mm Hg (depending on the number of antihypertensive medications being taken), and high cardiovascular disease risk. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, >1 g proteinuria, heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL·min
resultsThe mean age was 68.6 years, and 83.2% and 7.4% were non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black, respectively. The annual mortality rate was 2.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-2.48), and intensive SBP treatment was projected to prevent ≈107 500 deaths per year (95% CI, 93 300-121 200) and give rise to 56 100 (95% CI, 50 800-61 400) episodes of hypotension, 34 400 (95% CI, 31 200-37 600) episodes of syncope, 43 400 (95% CI, 39 400-47 500) serious electrolyte disorders, and 88 700 (95% CI, 80 400-97 000) cases of acute kidney injury per year. The analysis-of-extremes approach indicated that the range of estimated lower- and upper-bound number of deaths prevented per year with intensive SBP control was 34 600 to 179 600. Intensive SBP control was projected to prevent 46 100 (95% CI, 41 800-50 400) cases of heart failure annually.
conclusionsIf fully implemented in eligible US adults, intensive SBP treatment could prevent ≈107 500 deaths per year. A consequence of this treatment strategy, however, could be an increase in serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.