Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28193264›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

The clinical picture of cachexia: a mosaic of different parameters (experience of 503 patients).

S Schwarz, O Prokopchuk, K Esefeld, S Gröschel, J Bachmann, S Lorenzen, H Friess, M Halle, M E Martignoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A health-system-scale, episode-resolved multimodal atlas of cancer cachexia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The prognostic effect of hemoglobin on patients with cancer cachexia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S SchwarzDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
O ProkopchukDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany. olga.prokopchuk@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0697-512X
K EsefeldDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
S GröschelDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
J BachmannDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
S LorenzenDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
H FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
M HalleDepartment of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
M E MartignoniDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite our growing knowledge about the pathomechanisms of cancer cachexia, a whole clinical picture of the cachectic patient is still missing. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical characteristics in cancer patients with and without cachexia to get the whole picture of a cachectic patient.

methodsCancer patients of the University Clinic "Klinikum rechts der Isar" with gastrointestinal, gynecological, hematopoietic, lung and some other tumors were offered the possibility to take part in the treatment concept including a nutrition intervention and an individual training program according to their capability. We now report on the first 503 patients at the time of inclusion in the program between March 2011 and October 2015. We described clinical characteristics such as physical activity, quality of life, clinical dates and food intake.

resultsOf 503 patients with cancer, 131 patients (26.0%) were identified as cachectic, 369 (73.4%) as non-cachectic. The change in cachexia were 23% reduced capacity performance (108 Watt for non-cachectic-patients and 83 Watt for cachectic patients) and 12% reduced relative performance (1.53 Watt/kg for non-cachectic and 1.34 Watt/kg for cachectic patients) in ergometry test. 75.6% of non-cachectic and 54.3% of cachectic patients still received curative treatment.

conclusionCancer cachectic patients have multiple symptoms such as anemia, impaired kidney function and impaired liver function with elements of mild cholestasis, lower performance and a poorer quality of life in the EORTC questionnaire. Our study reveals biochemical and clinical specific features of cancer cachectic patients.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAnemiaCachexiaEatingExerciseFemaleHumansKidneyLiverLiver Function TestsMaleNeoplasmsNutritional StatusQuality of LifeCancer cachexiaClinical parametersClinical picture

Identifiers

PMID28193264
PMCPMC5307774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.