Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28193263›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2017

Automated freeze-thaw cycles for decellularization of tendon tissue - a pilot study.

Susanne Pauline Roth, Sina Marie Glauche, Amelie Plenge, Ina Erbe, Sandra Heller, Janina Burk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recent advances in bionic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne Pauline RothLarge Animal Clinic for Surgery, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 21, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. susanne.roth@uni-leipzig.de.
Sina Marie GlaucheSaxonian Incubator for Clinical Translation, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 55, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Amelie PlengeTierklinik Kaufungen, Pfingstweide 2, Kaufungen, 34260, Germany.
Ina ErbeLarge Animal Clinic for Surgery, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 21, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Sandra HellerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Janina BurkLarge Animal Clinic for Surgery, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 21, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Leipzig University · DETulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecellularization of tendon tissue plays a pivotal role in current tissue engineering approaches for in vitro research as well as for translation of graft-based tendon restoration into clinics. Automation of essential decellularization steps like freeze-thawing is crucial for the development of more standardized decellularization protocols and commercial graft production under good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions in the future.

methodsIn this study, a liquid nitrogen-based controlled rate freezer was utilized for automation of repeated freeze-thawing for decellularization of equine superficial digital flexor tendons. Additional tendon specimens underwent manually performed freeze-thaw cycles based on an established procedure. Tendon decellularization was completed by using non-ionic detergent treatment (Triton X-100). Effectiveness of decellularization was assessed by residual nuclei count and calculation of DNA content. Cytocompatibility was evaluated by culturing allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on the tendon scaffolds.

resultsThere were no significant differences in decellularization effectiveness between samples decellularized by the automated freeze-thaw procedure and samples that underwent manual freeze-thaw cycles. Further, we inferred no significant differences in the effectiveness of decellularization between two different cooling and heating rates applied in the automated freeze-thaw process. Both the automated protocols and the manually performed protocol resulted in roughly 2% residual nuclei and 13% residual DNA content. Successful cell culture was achieved with samples decellularized by automated freeze-thawing as well as with tendon samples decellularized by manually performed freeze-thaw cycles.

conclusionsAutomated freeze-thaw cycles performed by using a liquid nitrogen-based controlled rate freezer were as effective as previously described manual freeze-thaw procedures for decellularization of equine superficial digital flexor tendons. The automation of this key procedure in decellularization of large tendon samples is an important step towards the processing of large sample quantities under standardized conditions. Furthermore, with a view to the production of commercially available tendon graft-based materials for application in human and veterinary medicine, the automation of key procedural steps is highly required to develop manufacturing processes under GMP conditions.

Indexed as

FreezingTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCells, CulturedCell SeparationEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisExtracellular MatrixHorsesMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPilot ProjectsRoboticsTendonsTissue EngineeringAutomationControlled rate freezerDecellularizationHorseRegenerative medicineTendonTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28193263
PMCPMC5307874
OpenAlexW2588275297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.