Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28193219›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2017

The effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention in overweight and obese women on circulating cardiometabolic and inflammatory biomarkers: secondary analyses from the LIMIT randomised trial.

Lisa J Moran, Louise M Fraser, Tulika Sundernathan, Andrea R Deussen, Jennie Louise, Lisa N Yelland, Rosalie M Grivell, Anne Macpherson, Matthew W Gillman, Jeffrey S Robinson and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lisa J MoranThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Louise M FraserThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tulika SundernathanThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrea R DeussenThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jennie LouiseThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lisa N YellandThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rosalie M GrivellThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anne MacphersonThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Matthew W GillmanObesity Prevention Program, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey S RobinsonThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Julie A OwensThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jodie M DoddThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. jodie.dodd@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

Limiting Weight Gain in Overweight Pregnant Women: Effects on Mother and ChildR01HL094235 · NHLBI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI GILLMAN, MATTHEW W · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal overweight and obesity during pregnancy is associated with insulin resistance, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia and a low-grade state of chronic inflammation. The aim of this pre-specified analysis of secondary outcome measures was to evaluate the effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice on cardiometabolic and inflammatory biomarkers.

methodsWe conducted a multicentre trial in which pregnant women who were overweight or obese were randomised to receive either Lifestyle Advice or Standard Care. We report a range of pre-specified secondary maternal and newborn cardiometabolic and inflammatory biomarker outcomes. Maternal whole venous blood was collected at trial entry (mean 14 weeks gestation; non-fasting), at 28 weeks gestation (fasting), and at 36 weeks gestation (non-fasting). Cord blood was collected after birth and prior to the delivery of the placenta. A range of cardiometabolic and inflammatory markers were analysed (total cholesterol, triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acids, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, insulin, glucose, leptin, adiponectin, C-reactive protein, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, interferon gamma, TNF-α, and interleukins 1β, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10). Participants were analysed in the groups to which they were randomised, and were included in the analyses if they had a measure at any time point.

resultsOne or more biological specimens were available from 1951 women (989 Lifestyle Advice and 962 Standard Care), with cord blood from 1174 infants (596 Lifestyle Advice and 578 Standard Care). There were no statistically significant differences in mean cardiometabolic and inflammatory marker concentrations across pregnancy and in infant cord blood between treatment groups. Estimated treatment group differences were close to zero, with 95% confidence intervals spanning a range of differences that were short of clinical relevance. There was no evidence to suggest that the intervention effect was modified by maternal BMI category.

conclusionsDespite our findings, it will be worth considering potential relationships between cardiometabolic and inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes, including longer-term infant health and adiposity.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12607000161426 ; Date Registered 09/03/2007).

Indexed as

Life StyleAdultBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansObesityOverweightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareBiomarkersCardiometabolic markersDietary and lifestyle interventionInflammatory markersOverweight and obesityPregnancyRandomised trial

Identifiers

PMID28193219
PMCPMC5307888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.