ArticleBMC genetics2017
Whole-genome association analysis of pork meat pH revealed three significant regions and several potential genes in Finnish Yorkshire pigs.
Article in BMC genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide association analyses for growth, carcass composition, and meat quality traits of Iberian pigs fattened in free open air.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study for Belly Traits in Canadian Commercial Crossbred Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Expression genome-wide association study identifies key regulatory variants enriched with metabolic and immune functions in four porcine tissues.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Genetic Parameters for Egg Production Traits in Peking Ducks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genome-wide detection of selection signatures in Jianli pigs reveals novel cis-regulatory haplotype in EDNRB associated with two-end black coat color.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- The Genetic Architecture of Meat Quality Traits in a Crossbred Commercial Pig Population.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetic architecture and selection of Anhui autochthonous pig population revealed by whole genome resequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Gut Microbiota Modulate Rabbit Meat Quality in Response to Dietary Fiber.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- An insight into the runs of homozygosity distribution and breed differentiation in Mangalitsa pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Epigenome-wide association studies of meat traits in Chinese Yorkshire pigs highlights several DNA methylation loci and genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Evidence for and localization of proposed causative variants in cattle and pig genomes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Review
- Classical, Molecular, and Genomic Cytogenetics of the Pig, a Clinical Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Sperm Methylome Profiling Can Discern Fertility Levels in the Porcine Biomedical Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Assessment of Runs of Homozygosity and Estimates of Genomic Inbreeding in a Chinese Composite Pig Breed.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Integrated Genome-Wide Analysis of MicroRNA Expression Quantitative Trait Loci in Pig Longissimus Dorsi Muscle.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Piglet Uniformity and Farrowing Interval.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most commonly used quality measurements of pork is pH measured 24 h after slaughter. The most probable mode of inheritance for this trait is oligogenic with several known major genes, such as PRKAG3. In this study, we used whole-genome SNP genotypes of over 700 AI boars; after a quality check, 42,385 SNPs remained for association analysis. All the boars were purebred Finnish Yorkshire. To account for relatedness of the animals, a pedigree-based relationship matrix was used in a mixed linear model to test the effect of SNPs on pH measured from loin. A bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify the most promising genes in the significant regions related to meat quality.
resultsGenome-wide association study (GWAS) revealed three significant chromosomal regions: one on chromosome 3 (39.9 Mb-40.1 Mb) and two on chromosome 15 (58.5 Mb-60.5 Mb and 132 Mb-135 Mb including PRKAG3). A conditional analysis with a significant SNP in the PRKAG3 region, MARC0083357, as a covariate in the model retained the significant SNPs on chromosome 3. Even though linkage disequilibrium was relatively high over a long distance between MARC0083357 and other significant SNPs on chromosome 15, some SNPs retained their significance in the conditional analysis, even in the vicinity of PRKAG3. The significant regions harbored several genes, including two genes involved in cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling: ADCY9 and CREBBP. Based on functional and transcription factor-gene networks, the most promising candidate genes for meat pH are ADCY9, CREBBP, TRAP1, NRG1, PRKAG3, VIL1, TNS1, and IGFBP5, and the key transcription factors related to these genes are HNF4A, PPARG, and Nkx2-5.
conclusionsBased on SNP association, pathway, and transcription factor analysis, we were able to identify several genes with potential to control muscle cell homeostasis and meat quality. The associated SNPs can be used in selection for better pork. We also showed that post-GWAS analysis reveals important information about the genes' potential role on meat quality. The gained information can be used in later functional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.