Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28192502›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal or parietal cortex does not impair metacognitive visual awareness.

Daniel Bor, David J Schwartzman, Adam B Barrett, Anil K Seth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unlocking adults' implicit statistical learning by cognitive depletion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Competitive Frontoparietal Interactions Mediate Implicit Inferences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Distinguishing the Roles of Dorsolateral and Anterior PFC in Visual Metacognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel BorSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
David J SchwartzmanSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Adam B BarrettSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Anil K SethSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies commonly associate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and posterior parietal cortex with conscious perception. However, such studies only investigate correlation, rather than causation. In addition, many studies conflate objective performance with subjective awareness. In an influential recent paper, Rounis and colleagues addressed these issues by showing that continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) applied to the DLPFC impaired metacognitive (subjective) awareness for a perceptual task, while objective performance was kept constant. We attempted to replicate this finding, with minor modifications, including an active cTBS control site. Using a between-subjects design for both DLPFC and posterior parietal cortices, we found no evidence of a cTBS-induced metacognitive impairment. In a second experiment, we devised a highly rigorous within-subjects cTBS design for DLPFC, but again failed to find any evidence of metacognitive impairment. One crucial difference between our results and the Rounis study is our strict exclusion of data deemed unsuitable for a signal detection theory analysis. Indeed, when we included this unstable data, a significant, though invalid, metacognitive impairment was found. These results cast doubt on previous findings relating metacognitive awareness to DLPFC, and inform the current debate concerning whether or not prefrontal regions are preferentially implicated in conscious perception.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAwarenessFemaleHumansMaleMetacognitionParietal LobePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceTheta RhythmTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28192502
PMCPMC5305100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.