Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28192488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Does dystonic muscle activity affect sense of effort in cervical dystonia?

Loïc Carment, Marc A Maier, Sophie Sangla, Vincent Guiraud, Serge Mesure, Marie Vidailhet, Påvel G Lindberg, Jean-Pierre Bleton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02834871 (Integration of the Cervical Proprioceptive Signals in Patients With Cervical Dystonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02834871 nacompletednot on this map

Integration of the Cervical Proprioceptive Signals in Patients With Cervical Dystonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildRan2015 to 2015Enrolled40ConditionsCervical DystoniaArmsElectromyogram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Influence of External Forces on Wrist Proprioception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Loïc CarmentFR3636, CNRS / Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Marc A MaierFR3636, CNRS / Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sophie SanglaService de Neurologie, Fondation OPH de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Vincent GuiraudUniversité Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U894, Paris, France.
Serge MesureUMR 7287, CNRS Aix Marseille Université, Institut des Sciences du Mouvement, Marseille, France.
Marie VidailhetSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France.
Påvel G LindbergFR3636, CNRS / Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre BletonService de Neurologie, Fondation OPH de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRCentre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFondation de Rothschild · FRFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · FRInserm · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal dystonia has been associated with deficient processing of sense of effort cues. However, corresponding studies are lacking in cervical dystonia (CD). We hypothesized that dystonic muscle activity would perturb neck force control based on sense of effort cues.

methodsNeck extension force control was investigated in 18 CD patients with different clinical features (7 with and 11 without retrocollis) and in 19 control subjects. Subjects performed force-matching and force-maintaining tasks at 5% and 20% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Three task conditions were tested: i) with visual force feedback, ii) without visual feedback (requiring use of sense of effort), iii) without visual feedback, but with neck extensor muscle vibration (modifying muscle afferent cues). Trapezius muscle activity was recorded using electromyography (EMG).

resultsCD patients did not differ in task performance from healthy subjects when using visual feedback (ANOVA, p>0.7). In contrast, when relying on sense of effort cues (without visual feedback, 5% MVC), force control was impaired in patients without retrocollis (p = 0.006), but not in patients with retrocollis (p>0.2). Compared to controls, muscle vibration without visual feedback significantly affected performance in patients with retrocollis (p<0.001), but not in patients without retrocollis. Extensor EMG during rest, included as covariate in ANOVA, explained these group differences.

conclusionThis study shows that muscle afferent feedback biases sense of effort cues when controlling neck forces in patients with CD. The bias acts on peripheral or central sense of effort cues depending on whether the task involves dystonic muscles. This may explain why patients with retrocollis more accurately matched isometric neck extension forces. This highlights the need to consider clinical features (pattern of dystonic muscles) when evaluating sensorimotor integration in CD.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceDystoniaElectromyographyFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalNeck MusclesTorticollisVibration

Identifiers

PMID28192488
PMCPMC5305099
OpenAlexW2588969658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.