Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28192450›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A novel RNA sequencing data analysis method for cell line authentication.

Erik Fasterius, Cinzia Raso, Susan Kennedy, Nora Rauch, Pär Lundin, Walter Kolch, Mathias Uhlén, Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CCLHunter: An efficient toolkit for cancer cell line authentication.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  4. Effect ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik FasteriusSchool of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cinzia RasoSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Susan KennedySystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Nora RauchSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Pär LundinScience for Life Laboratory, Dept of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Walter KolchSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Mathias UhlénSchool of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cristina Al-Khalili SzigyartoSchool of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-1905
University College Dublin · IEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SEStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a novel analysis method that can interrogate the authenticity of biological samples used for generation of transcriptome profiles in public data repositories. The method uses RNA sequencing information to reveal mutations in expressed transcripts and subsequently confirms the identity of analysed cells by comparison with publicly available cell-specific mutational profiles. Cell lines constitute key model systems widely used within cancer research, but their identity needs to be confirmed in order to minimise the influence of cell contaminations and genetic drift on the analysis. Using both public and novel data, we demonstrate the use of RNA-sequencing data analysis for cell line authentication by examining the validity of COLO205, DLD1, HCT15, HCT116, HKE3, HT29 and RKO colorectal cancer cell lines. We successfully authenticate the studied cell lines and validate previous reports indicating that DLD1 and HCT15 are synonymous. We also show that the analysed HKE3 cells harbour an unexpected KRAS-G13D mutation and confirm that this cell line is a genuine KRAS dosage mutant, rather than a true isogenic derivative of HCT116 expressing only the wild type KRAS. This authentication method could be used to revisit the numerous cell line based RNA sequencing experiments available in public data repositories, analyse new experiments where whole genome sequencing is not available, as well as facilitate comparisons of data from different experiments, platforms and laboratories.

Indexed as

MutationCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHCT116 CellsHT29 CellsHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Reproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID28192450
PMCPMC5305277
OpenAlexW2588484968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.