Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28192443›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques.

Mark Andrew Miller, Benjamin Thomas Crane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A case-control study of visually evoked postural responses in childhood with primary headaches.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark Andrew MillerSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Benjamin Thomas CraneDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-1257

Funding

Multi-modal vestibular perceptionR01DC013580 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CRANE, BENJAMIN T · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
Visual and Vestibular Percepts of MotionK23DC011298 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CRANE, BENJAMIN T · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC011298NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vection is an illusory perception of self-motion that occurs when a visual motion is presented in the majority of the visual field. We used certainty estimate (CE) and inertial nulling (IN) techniques to study the effect of visual stimuli on roll perception in 10 migraine and 9 control subjects. A visual roll stimulus was presented for 1 to 8s. For the IN method, an inertial stimulus was delivered during the final 1s of the visual stimulus during which subjects judged the direction of perceived motion. The inertial motion was varied to find the point of subjective equality (PSE) at which both responses were equally likely to be reported. For the CE trials, the same durations of visual motion were used but without inertial motion and subjects rated their certainty of motion on a scale of 0-100. The overall difference in PSE between 1s and 8s subjects is significant (p = 0.03). Migraineurs had a ten fold larger effect in IN studies in the 8s than 1s (p = 0.01), but controls did not have a significant difference (p = 0.72). Unlike the control population, in migraineurs the perception of roll increased significantly with the duration of the visual stimulus. There was a large variation between subjects with both the CE and IN measures. The CE measure was poorly correlated with IN measures but demonstrated a similar trend with larger variation between subjects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersMotionMotion PerceptionMovementPhotic StimulationPsychometricsTime FactorsVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID28192443
PMCPMC5305052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.