Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28192431›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Comparative genome analysis of VSP-II and SNPs reveals heterogenic variation in contemporary strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 isolated from cholera patients in Kolkata, India.

Daisuke Imamura, Masatomo Morita, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Tamaki Mizuno, Taichiro Takemura, Tetsu Yamashiro, Goutam Chowdhury, Gururaja P Pazhani, Asish K Mukhopadhyay, Thandavarayan Ramamurthy and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Virulence of Cholera Toxin Gene-PositiveFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Point Mutation inInfection and immunity · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daisuke ImamuraCollaborative Research Center of Okayama University for Infectious Diseases in India, Okayama University, Kolkata, India.
Masatomo MoritaDepartment of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi SekizukaPathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Tamaki MizunoCollaborative Research Center of Okayama University for Infectious Diseases in India, Okayama University, Kolkata, India.
Taichiro TakemuraVietnam Research Station, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tetsu YamashiroVietnam Research Station, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Goutam ChowdhuryDivision of Bacteriology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Gururaja P PazhaniDivision of Bacteriology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Asish K MukhopadhyayDivision of Bacteriology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
Thandavarayan RamamurthyTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.
Shin-Ichi MiyoshiGraduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Makoto KurodaPathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumio ShinodaCollaborative Research Center of Okayama University for Infectious Diseases in India, Okayama University, Kolkata, India.
Makoto OhnishiDepartment of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholera is an acute diarrheal disease and a major public health problem in many developing countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Since the Bay of Bengal is considered the epicenter for the seventh cholera pandemic, it is important to understand the genetic dynamism of Vibrio cholerae from Kolkata, as a representative of the Bengal region. We analyzed whole genome sequence data of V. cholerae O1 isolated from cholera patients in Kolkata, India, from 2007 to 2014 and identified the heterogeneous genomic region in these strains. In addition, we carried out a phylogenetic analysis based on the whole genome single nucleotide polymorphisms to determine the genetic lineage of strains in Kolkata. This analysis revealed the heterogeneity of the Vibrio seventh pandemic island (VSP)-II in Kolkata strains. The ctxB genotype was also heterogeneous and was highly related to VSP-II types. In addition, phylogenetic analysis revealed the shifts in predominant strains in Kolkata. Two distinct lineages, 1 and 2, were found between 2007 and 2010. However, the proportion changed markedly in 2010 and lineage 2 strains were predominant thereafter. Lineage 2 can be divided into four sublineages, I, II, III and IV. The results of this study indicate that lineages 1 and 2-I were concurrently prevalent between 2007 and 2009, and lineage 2-III observed in 2010, followed by the predominance of lineage 2-IV in 2011 and continued until 2014. Our findings demonstrate that the epidemic of cholera in Kolkata was caused by several distinct strains that have been constantly changing within the genetic lineages of V. cholerae O1 in recent years.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomic IslandsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCholeraCholera ToxinGenome, BacterialGenotypeHumansIndiaMolecular EpidemiologyPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASequence HomologyVibrio cholerae O1Cholera Toxin

Identifiers

PMID28192431
PMCPMC5349696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.