Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28192108›Full record

SynthesisGastroenterology2017

Timely Use of Probiotics in Hospitalized Adults Prevents Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review With Meta-Regression Analysis.

Nicole T Shen, Anna Maw, Lyubov L Tmanova, Alejandro Pino, Kayley Ancy, Carl V Crawford, Matthew S Simon, Arthur T Evans

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
24.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Effectiveness of Bio-K+ for the prevention ofInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024
    Trial
  10. Nutrients · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gut Microbiome Recovery inDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole T ShenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. Electronic address: nts9004@nyp.org.
Anna MawHospitalist Medicine Section, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Lyubov L TmanovaSamuel J. Wood Library and CV Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Alejandro PinoNewYork-Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Kayley AncyNewYork-Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Carl V CrawfordDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Matthew S SimonSection of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Arthur T EvansSection of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsSystematic reviews have provided evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in preventing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but guidelines do not recommend probiotic use for prevention of CDI. We performed an updated systematic review to help guide clinical practice.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Journal of Probiotics and Prebiotics, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials evaluating use of probiotics and CDI in hospitalized adults taking antibiotics. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and overall quality of the evidence. Primary and secondary outcomes were incidence of CDI and adverse events, respectively. Secondary analyses examined the effects of probiotic species, dose, timing, formulation, duration, and study quality.

resultsWe analyzed data from 19 published studies, comprising 6261 subjects. The incidence of CDI in the probiotic cohort, 1.6% (54 of 3277), was lower than of controls, 3.9% (115 of 2984) (P < .001). The pooled relative risk of CDI in probiotic users was 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.57; I

conclusionsIn a systematic review with meta-regression analysis, we found evidence that administration of probiotics closer to the first dose of antibiotic reduces the risk of CDI by >50% in hospitalized adults. Future research should focus on optimal probiotic dose, species, and formulation. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42015016395.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHospitalizationAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileCross InfectionEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousGastrointestinal TractHumansIncidenceOdds RatioProbioticsRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic-Associated DiarrheaLactobacillusMeta-analysisNosocomial Infection

Identifiers

PMID28192108
OpenAlexW2586526765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.