ReviewClinical cardiology2017
ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: 2016 update.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- When the heart deceives: a case report of hyperthyroidism disguised as STEMI in female pregnant patient.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Antiplatelet Drugs Use in Pregnancy-Review of the Current Practice and Future Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Trends in the incidence and in-patient outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: Insights from the national inpatient sample.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Twin Pregnancy: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban combined with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- Article
- Diagnostic Angiograms and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Pregnancy.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2020Review
- Ischemic stroke and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in pregnancy.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2020Review
- The Role of Cardiac Biomarkers in Pregnancy.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017Review
- ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: 2016 update.Clinical cardiology · 2017Review
- Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: Current diagnosis and management approaches.Indian heart journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during pregnancy or the early postpartum period is rare, but can be devastating for both the mother and the fetus. There have been major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes in the general population, but there is little consensus on the approach to diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women. This article reviews the literature relating to the pathophysiology of AMI in pregnant patients and the challenges in diagnosis and treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in this unique population. From a cardiologist, maternal-fetal medicine specialist, and anesthesiologist's perspective, we provide recommendations for the diagnosis and management of STEMI occurring during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.