Trial reportPhysics in medicine and biology2017
A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic PET imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy.
Trial report in Physics in medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated PET/CT simulation framework for virtual imaging trials and quantitative performance evaluation.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2026Article
- An end-to-end deep learning pipeline to derive blood input with partial volume corrections for automated parametric brain PET mapping.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2024Article
- Framing protocol optimization in oncological Patlak parametric imaging with uKinetics.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Comparison between a dual-time-window protocol and other simplified protocols for dynamic total-bodyEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Current status and future of targeted peptide receptor radionuclide positron emission tomography imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Review
- Dynamic FDG-PET/CT in the Initial Staging of Primary Breast Cancer: Clinicopathological Correlations.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- Does whole-body PatlakEuropean radiology · 2019Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [Molecular imaging and biology · 2019Article
- Imaging and Molecular Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Improved discrimination between benign and malignant LDCT screening-detected lung nodules with dynamic over staticPhysics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a method to evaluate variations in the PET imaging process in order to characterize the relative ability of static and dynamic metrics to measure breast cancer response to therapy in a clinical trial setting. We performed a virtual clinical trial by generating 540 independent and identically distributed PET imaging study realizations for each of 22 original dynamic fluorodeoxyglucose (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.